OSHA Fines Brunalli Construction Co. $180,950 for Fall and Drowning Hazards

Brunalli Construction Co. of Southington, Conn., faces $180,950 in proposed OSHA fines for allegedly failing to protect its employees against fall, drowning and other hazards while they worked to rebuild a bridge over the Housatonic River in the Falls Village section of Canaan, Conn.

Article Tools

  • Bookmark

A December 2008 OSHA inspection found employees exposed to falls of up to 43 feet into the river while working without fall protection on unprotected or inadequately guarded sections of the bridge and using an access ladder of inadequate height. They also were exposed to drowning hazards due to the lack of life jackets, ring buoys and a lifesaving skiff that are required to be used and readily available on site when employees work over water.

"The significant hazard of a four-story plunge was exacerbated by the lack of required lifesaving rescue equipment," said C. William Freeman III, OSHA's area director in Hartford. "While it's fortunate no fall or drowning occurred, the potential for a fatal or serious accident was real and present at this jobsite."

As a result, OSHA issued Brunalli Construction three willful citations, with $147,000 in proposed fines, for the fall, drowning and ladder hazards and 10 serious citations, with $33,950 in proposed fines, for additional fall-related hazards, puncture and laceration hazards from a damaged cable guardrail system, no hardhats for employees exposed to overhead hazards, amputation and laceration hazards from unguarded grinders, and no trained emergency responders on site.

When EHS Today contacted Brunalli Construction, the employee who answered the phone said the company declined to comment on OSHA’s findings and citations.

Brunalli Construction has 15 business days from receipt of the citations and proposed penalties to comply, request and participate in an informal conference with the OSHA area director or contest the citations and proposed penalties before the independent Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission.

More information from OSHA about fall hazards and safeguards.

Want to use this article? Click here for options!
© 2010 Penton Media Inc.

Acceptable Use Policy comments powered by Disqus

SafetyLive TV

SafetyLive TV

Check out SafetyLive TV now!

Tune in daily to see company video programs, product demonstrations, reports from industry trade shows and interviews with newsmakers.

Featured Videos:

MCR Safety Logo

MCR Safety - Making Safety a LifeStyle

MCR Safety’s Professional Grade PPE delivers a higher standard for consumers that demand the very best in safety.

More Videos

Online Resources

Webinars

Legislated ergonomics standard or not, recession or boom time, companies are realizing the benefits of integrating a sustainable ergonomics process within their business operations. The approach to managing and reducing ergonomic injuries and their costs vary widely. Register Now


More Webinars

Podcasts

Learn about ISO 16602, the international standard that classifies chemical protective clothing performance.

Listen now.

More Podcasts

eNews

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit ruled that in the case of Elaine Chao v. Summit Contractors, OSHA regulation 29 C.F.R. Sec. 1910.12(a) “is unambiguous in that it does not preclude OSHA from issuing citations to employers for violations when their own employees are not exposed to any hazards related to the violations.”

Read Entire Issue

Pop Quiz


Entries with a 100% score are automatically entered into a drawing for a $50 Visa Gift Card!

Take the pop quiz!

What You're Saying

Featured Suppliers