Thinkstock
Image

A Green Environment Lowers Women’s Mortality Rate

April 18, 2016
Women living in areas with greater amounts of vegetation have a 12 percent lower death rate than their counterparts.

When it comes to women’s health, the grass really is greener on the other side.

Women who live in areas with the greatest amount of vegetation have a 12 percent lower death rate than women who live in areas with the least amount of vegetation, according to new research from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), part of the National Institutes of Health.

“It is important to know that trees and plants provide health benefits in our communities, as well as beauty,” said NIEHS director Linda Birnbaum.  “The finding of reduced mortality suggests that vegetation may be important to health in a broad range of ways.”

Women’s lifespans are lengthened by the improved mental health and social engagement of those living in lusher areas, as well as by the increased physical activity and lower exposure to air pollution those residents experience, the research found.

And those living in areas with more vegetation are less likely to die from kidney disease, respiratory disease or cancer. In fact, researchers found that mortality rates consistently decreased as vegetation nearby increased.

Women living around more plants and trees were found to have a 41 percent lower death rate for kidney disease, a 34 percent lower death rate for respiratory disease, and a 13 percent lower death rate for cancer.

The study, which was conducted by scientists at Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health and Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, analyzed the greenness around the homes of 108,630 women using home locations and high resolution satellite imagery. The scientists then tracked the changes in vegetation and the number of participant deaths (8,604 deaths) from 2000 to 2008.

In addition to greenness, the scientists also factored age, race, ethnicity, smoking and socioeconomic status, as well as other mortality risks into their study.

“The ability to examine vegetation in relatively fine detail around so many homes, while also considering the characteristics of the individual participants, is a major strength of this study,” said Bonnie Joubert, Ph.D., NIEHS scientific program director overseeing the study.

About the Author

Ginger Christ | Associate Editor

Ginger Christ is an associate editor for EHS Today, a Penton publication.

She has covered business news for the past seven years, working at daily and weekly newspapers and magazines in Ohio, including the Dayton Business Journal and Crain’s Cleveland Business.

Most recently, she covered transportation and leadership for IndustryWeek, a sister publication to EHS Today.

She holds a bachelor of arts in English and in Film Studies from the University of Pittsburgh.

Connect on Google+ | LinkedIn | Twitter

Sponsored Recommendations

Unleashing the Power of Stories: Level-up Safety Culture with Three Easy Storytelling Tools

Jan. 3, 2025
Effective storytelling can shape a workplace culture and improve safety, especially in times of change when risk soars, hazards multiply and human factors threaten to derail progress...

4 Resources to Get Better Safety Performances From Supervisors

Jan. 3, 2025
Here is an overview of four of the best safety resources that safety folks can use as they consider how to get better safety performances from supervisors and workplace leaders...

4 Often Overlooked Types of New Workers—and the Different Dangers They Face

Jan. 3, 2025
This blog post is an adapted excerpt from the safety guide Fitting in Fast: Making a Safe Workplace for New Hires, which examines data and best practices regarding the protection...

4 Ways Frontline Supervisors Influence Workplace Safety

Jan. 3, 2025
These four areas determine whether frontline supervisors are having a positive or negative effect on workplace safety.

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!