Chris Hondros/Getty Images
On June 15 the Colorado Supreme Court held in a unanimous decision in Coats v Dish Network that employers are still free to prohibit employee marijuana use in their workforces and can still discipline and terminate employees who test positive for the drug

Colorado Employers Handed Medical Marijuana Victory

June 17, 2015
The Colorado Supreme Court has issued an employer-friendly opinion regarding the use of medical marijuana use that will have wide-ranging implications for all Colorado employers.

On June 15, the Colorado Supreme Court held in a unanimous decision (in Coats v. Dish Network) that employers are still free to prohibit employee marijuana use in their workforces, and can still discipline and terminate employees who test positive for the drug, despite state law permitting its recreational and medicinal use.

In so doing, the Court issued an employer-friendly opinion that will have wide-ranging implications for all Colorado employers.

Case Background – Is Pot Use “Legal?”

The employee in the case is a quadriplegic who suffers intense muscle spasms as a result of a non-work-related car accident. He uses medical marijuana under Colorado’s regulatory medical marijuana system, which he says helps his spasms.

The employee worked for Dish Network as a customer service representative for three years, until he tested positive for marijuana during a random drug test and was fired pursuant to Dish Network’s zero-tolerance drug policy. After he was fired, the employee filed a wrongful termination lawsuit and claimed that the firing violated Colorado’s “lawful off-duty activities” statute, which prohibits employers from discriminating against or terminating employees who engage in lawful activities outside of work.

The employee argued that his medical marijuana use was “lawful” under state law and, therefore, his termination violated the statute.  The Colorado Court of Appeals rejected his claim, ruling that even if medical marijuana use is legal in Colorado, marijuana use of any kind is still prohibited by federal law, and thus medical marijuana use is not “lawful” for purposes of Colorado’s lawful off-duty conduct statute.

Colorado Supreme Court Upholds Employers’ Rights

The Colorado Supreme Court agreed, ruling that marijuana use is not lawful conduct for purposes of Colorado’s lawful off-duty conduct statute. To reach this conclusion, the court concluded that it must look to both state and federal law to make the critical determination.

The court then reviewed the federal Controlled Substances Act, and held that because medical marijuana use is unlawful under federal law, it is therefore not lawful activity under Colorado’s lawful off-duty conduct statute. As such, the court ruled that Dish Network’s decision to fire the employee because he tested positive for marijuana did not violate Colorado’s lawful off-duty conduct statute.

Good News for Employers

This decision is a significant victory for employers. By ruling in this fashion, the Colorado Supreme Court has unequivocally affirmed employers’ rights to prohibit employees from using marijuana in Colorado, and to discipline and terminate employees who violate such prohibitions.

Although the decision only discusses medical marijuana and does not explicitly consider retail marijuana use, its logic can easily be extended to cover recreational marijuana use, which is similarly unlawful under federal law and thus not lawful conduct for purposes of Colorado’s lawful off-duty conduct statute. The court’s reasoning may also have potential future applicability to other conduct that is lawful under state law but unlawful under federal law.

In sum, employers who have policies requiring employees to undergo drug testing and who have disciplined or terminated employees for testing positive for marijuana can continue these actions, knowing now that these policies and termination decisions have been validated by the Colorado Supreme Court.

(This legal alert from Fisher & Phillips LLP was used with permission and provides an overview of a specific Colorado Supreme Court decision. It is not intended to be, and should not be construed as, legal advice for any particular fact situation.)

About the author: Adam Brown is an associate in the Denver office of Fisher & Phillips. His practice includes drafting employee handbooks, counseling employers in all areas of labor and employment law, defending employers at the administrative agency level, representing employers in state and federal courts and representing employers in traditional labor arbitrations. While in law school, Adam served as a judicial extern to Colorado 2nd Judicial District Court Chief Judge Michael A. Martinez.

Sponsored Recommendations

Committing to Safety: Why Leadership’s Role in Safety Excellence is Key

Jan. 13, 2025
Leadership has the power to transform an organization through their behavior and vision, which can result in the creation of an organizational culturethat supports safety excellence...

Speak Up! Cementing "See Something, Say Something" to Drive Safety

Jan. 13, 2025
Many organizations promote "see something, say something" to encourage their people to intervene and make work safe. But most don't go far enough to equip teams with the skills...

The Truth and Challenges of Cultivating Chronic Unease

Jan. 13, 2025
DEKRA announces its latest white paper, “The Truth and Challenges of Cultivating Chronic Unease,” as a definitive look into why being vulnerable to incidents strengthens our commitment...

Mitigating Risks: Strategies for Safeguarding Workers in Hazardous Workplaces

Jan. 13, 2025
Join our expert team in taking on the challenge to make safety part of your organization’s DNA as work, the workforce, and workplaces evolve.

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!