NIOSH Study Examines Safety, Health Implications of Firefighters’ Boots

As the population of firefighters becomes more diverse, one size or style of protective equipment may not fit all responders. Can the weight of protective boots therefore put some firefighters at risk? Scientists at two National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) laboratories are conducting research to understand the physiological and biomechanical effects of boot weight on male and female firefighters.

Article Tools

  • Bookmark

More than 1.1 million men and women work as firefighters in the United States. Firefighters have an increased risk of occupational injuries and fatalities due to the stressful nature of their work and the complexity of their work environment. According to the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), firefighters suffered an estimated 80,100 occupational injuries in 2007. About a quarter of these injuries were due to overexertion and another quarter were due to falls.

As part of their personal protective equipment, most firefighters wear either heavily insulated rubber boots or leather boots. Rubber boots are 3 pounds heavier than leather boots, but generally cost about half as much. Standards-setting organizations, such as the NFPA, have expressed concern that boot weight may contribute to the stress of firefighting.

The research was conducted in NIOSH laboratories in Morgantown, W.Va., and Pittsburgh, Pa., with study participants recruited from the Morgantown, W.Va., western Maryland, northern Virginia and eastern Ohio areas. These firefighters, while carrying a backpack and wearing a pair of randomly assigned rubber boots (2 models), leather boots (2 models), or safety shoes (baseline), were tested for oxygen consumption, joint movement, and walking patterns. The boots tested in the study were boots that NFPA and firefighters reported as commonly used.

Affected Movement, Balance

The preliminary findings from the study, which have been reported as work in progress at several scientific conferences, suggest that firefighters adjusted their walking patterns and postures when wearing heavy firefighter boots. They walked slower, took wider steps, and for each stride they took, the percentage of time when both feet were in contact with the floor was longer with heavier boots, suggesting that they need more time to balance their body during walking. Female firefighters tended to walk slower and take smaller steps than male firefighters. The gender differences in gait patterns emphasize the importance for including female subjects in the study.

In other preliminary findings of this study, boots weight was found to affect the way study participants naturally move their lower bodies. The boots limited firefighters’ ankle, knee, and hip motions, and such restrictions may affect their ability to perform tasks efficiently, such as maintaining balance or crossing obstacles effectively during firefighting.

In addition to changing the way firefighters move while performing certain tasks, an increase in boot weight can affect firefighters’ energy expenditure and breathing. In the NIOSH study, firefighters performed two exercise tasks: 1) walking on a treadmill while carrying a hose, and 2) climbing a revolving staircase. For both tasks, firefighters’ oxygen consumption, the amount they breathed, and heart rate were significantly greater when wearing rubber boots as compared with leather boots. Such increases in breathing and energy expenditure could decrease the duration of a firefighter’s self-contained breathing apparatus in an actual fire scenario.

NIOSH hopes that the final results of this research, when the study is completed and published, will provide needed information to the NFPA, fire departments and firefighters. Further research will investigate the effects of different types of firefighter boot soles and the effect of boot weight on walking over obstacles.

Want to use this article? Click here for options!
© 2010 Penton Media Inc.

Acceptable Use Policy comments powered by Disqus

SafetyLive TV

SafetyLive TV

Check out SafetyLive TV now!

Tune in daily to see company video programs, product demonstrations, reports from industry trade shows and interviews with newsmakers.

Featured Videos:

MCR Safety Logo

MCR Safety - Making Safety a LifeStyle

MCR Safety’s Professional Grade PPE delivers a higher standard for consumers that demand the very best in safety.

More Videos

Online Resources

Webinars

Legislated ergonomics standard or not, recession or boom time, companies are realizing the benefits of integrating a sustainable ergonomics process within their business operations. The approach to managing and reducing ergonomic injuries and their costs vary widely. Register Now


More Webinars

Podcasts

Learn about ISO 16602, the international standard that classifies chemical protective clothing performance.

Listen now.

More Podcasts

eNews

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit ruled that in the case of Elaine Chao v. Summit Contractors, OSHA regulation 29 C.F.R. Sec. 1910.12(a) “is unambiguous in that it does not preclude OSHA from issuing citations to employers for violations when their own employees are not exposed to any hazards related to the violations.”

Read Entire Issue

Pop Quiz


Entries with a 100% score are automatically entered into a drawing for a $50 Visa Gift Card!

Take the pop quiz!

What You're Saying

Featured Suppliers