© Mr.pipat Pajongwong | Dreamstime
Osha Regulatory Update 60c0c1af5d954

Regulatory Update: Adverse Reactions to Vaccines

June 9, 2021
OSHA issues FAQs regarding adverse reactions to vaccines.

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has added an additional administrative and recordkeeping issue that employers need to consider about recording adverse vaccine reactions among workers.

In recently issued FAQs, OSHA states that if an employer requires its employees to be vaccinated as a condition of employment, then any adverse reaction to the vaccine is considered to be work related.

As a result, it would need to be recorded under OSHA rules when it is a new case and meets one or more of the general recording criteria in the recordkeeping regulation, for example, days away from work, restricted work or transfer to another job, or medical treatment beyond first aid.

On the other hand, OSHA says that it will exercise its enforcement discretion and will not require adverse reactions to be recorded when the employer only “recommends” that employees receive the vaccine, even if it provides vaccines or makes arrangements for employees to receive them offsite, point out attorneys John Ho and James J. Sullivan, Jr.  of the law firm of Cozen O'Connor.

OSHA stresses that the “vaccine must be truly voluntary.” The agency explains that it must be the employee’s choice to accept or reject the vaccine without consequence to their performance rating or professional advancement, and an employee who elects not to take the vaccine cannot suffer any repercussions from their choice.

The FAQs do not directly address whether employers who provide incentives could cross the line from voluntary to mandatory, particularly if the incentive is more than nominal. In prior guidance issued in 2012, OSHA took the position that if an incentive is great enough that the loss of such an incentive would dissuade reasonable workers from reporting injuries, it could be retaliatory.

Ho and Sullivan recommend that employers be aware that this could be a potential issue with respect to vaccines and should consider making any incentive for an employee to receive a vaccine not so generous or enticing so as to raise the question of whether agreeing to the vaccination was truly “voluntary.”

About the Author

David Sparkman

David Sparkman is founding editor of ACWI Advance (www.acwi.org), the newsletter of the American Chain of Warehouses Inc. He also heads David Sparkman Consulting, a Washington D.C. area public relations and communications firm. Prior to these he was director of industry relations for the International Warehouse Logistics Association. Sparkman has also been a freelance writer, specializing in logistics and freight transportation. He has served as vice president of communications for the American Moving and Storage Association, director of communications for the National Private Truck Council, and for two decades with American Trucking Associations on its weekly newspaper, Transport Topics.

Sponsored Recommendations

Navigating ESG Risk in Your Supply Chain

Sept. 26, 2024
Discover the role of ESG in supply chains, from reducing carbon footprints to complying with new regulations and enhancing long-term business value.

Understanding ESG Risks in the Supply Chain

Sept. 26, 2024
Understand the critical role of ESG in supply chains, the risks for hiring companies, and the competitive edge suppliers gain by prioritizing sustainability.

Best Practices for Managing Subcontractor Risk

Sept. 26, 2024
Discover how to effectively manage subcontractor risk with unified strategies, enhanced oversight, and clear communication for consistent safety and compliance.

Building a Culture of Support: Suicide Prevention and Mental Health in the Workplace

Sept. 26, 2024
Find best practices for setting up an organizational culture that promotes positive mental health and suicide prevention.

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!