Thinkstock
finger amputation

Investigation of Finger Amputation Uncovers Safety Violations at Food Processor

Dec. 28, 2017
A Pasco, Wash., food processing plant has been cited for repeated serious violations after a worker's finger was partially amputated in moving machinery.

Freeze Pak, a division of Oregon Potato Co., faces $92,400 in fines from Washington’s Department of Labor & Industries (L&I) for three repeat-serious violations, along with two serious and one general violation.

L&I began an investigation of the facility in June after the worker suffered a fractured wrist and partially amputated finger when his hand got caught in a conveyor while he was cleaning under it. It’s the third time in three years that workers for the company have suffered amputation injuries on the job.

Working in and around hazardous machinery and equipment requires safety procedures, known as lockout/tagout, to prevent the machinery from starting or moving during service and maintenance. The penalty for the repeat-serious lockout/tagout violation is $52,800.

L&I has cited the employer four times in three years for similar violations; three of those involved a finger amputation. 

The investigation also found two instances where Freeze Pak did not adequately guard machinery to protect employees from exposure to serious injuries like broken bones, amputations, permanent disability or death. Both cases involved problems with a waste conveyor. The employer was cited for the same two violations in December 2014. Because of that, they’re considered repeat-serious violations and carry a penalty of $13,200.

Two serious violations cited were for lack of a written energy-control program to prevent inadvertent startup of machine or equipment, and for not providing suitable tools to protect employees from hazards while working the conveyor. Those violations each carry a penalty of $6,600.

The company also was cited for one general violation for not inspecting and replacing worn parts on a “door closer” on the conveyor that wasn’t working. General violations typically do not carry a penalty.

As a result of the repeat-serious violations associated with an amputation injury, the employer has been identified as a severe violator and will be subject to follow-up inspections to determine if the cited conditions still exist in the future.

Freeze Pak has appealed the citation.

About the Author

Sandy Smith

Sandy Smith is the former content director of EHS Today, and is currently the EHSQ content & community lead at Intelex Technologies Inc. She has written about occupational safety and health and environmental issues since 1990.

Sponsored Recommendations

Committing to Safety: Why Leadership’s Role in Safety Excellence is Key

Jan. 13, 2025
Leadership has the power to transform an organization through their behavior and vision, which can result in the creation of an organizational culturethat supports safety excellence...

Speak Up! Cementing "See Something, Say Something" to Drive Safety

Jan. 13, 2025
Many organizations promote "see something, say something" to encourage their people to intervene and make work safe. But most don't go far enough to equip teams with the skills...

The Truth and Challenges of Cultivating Chronic Unease

Jan. 13, 2025
DEKRA announces its latest white paper, “The Truth and Challenges of Cultivating Chronic Unease,” as a definitive look into why being vulnerable to incidents strengthens our commitment...

Environmentally Sustainable Solutions: Processes, Products, and Services Using ISO 14001

Jan. 13, 2025
ISO 14001 is a standard set by the International Organization for Standardization valid since 1996. It helps companies and organizations align their environmental management systems...

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!