Image

Increased Near-Miss Reporting Results in Improved Safety Performance

May 3, 2013
Companies that focus on leading indicators, such as near miss reporting, show improved organizational safety performance.

How do you measure what did not occur? A near-miss incident on job sites traditionally is defined as one that leaves no injuries, no property or equipment damages and little or no evidence that it even occurred. As a result, companies often ignore near-miss incidents.

However, companies that experience world-class safety performance know that when reported and acted upon, near misses enable early intervention, and are great opportunities to improve organizational safety performance.

"Near Miss Reporting – a Missing Link in Safety Culture," a peer-reviewed feature in the May issue of Professional Safety, examines several studies that have shown that near misses greatly outnumber serious accidents involving fatality, injury or property damage. For example, a 1993 study by Health and Safety Executive researchers found that for every lost time injury more than three days in length there were 189 non-injury cases.

However, many organizations and their employees remain resistant to near-miss reporting, mostly because there is no universal definition of a near miss, there’s fear of punishment or retaliation for a near-miss report, peer pressure, concern about record and reputation, the inconvenience of filling out a near-miss report and the desire of some employers to maintain the status quo.

“We want to develop a culture that doesn’t wait until someone is injured, but identifies the risk before it happens,” explained the article’s author Mike Williamsen, Ph.D., CSP who added that it is important to develop a safety culture that engages all employees. “We have to engage people on the front line to eliminate personal risks.”

Referring to near-miss reporting as a “personal risk assessment,” Williamsen offers several solutions to overcoming the barriers to reporting near-misses in his article, that can be put into place to achieve what he calls a culture-based safety system:

  • Define expectations that all employees report unsafe conditions or perceived risks
  • Provide employees with safety training
  • Provide measurement for how near-miss reporting has improved safety performance
  • Recognize and reward employees and crews for pro-active safety actions.

Professional Safety is published by the American Society of Safety Engineers.

About the Author

Sandy Smith

Sandy Smith is the former content director of EHS Today, and is currently the EHSQ content & community lead at Intelex Technologies Inc. She has written about occupational safety and health and environmental issues since 1990.

Sponsored Recommendations

What is the key difference between OSHAS 18001 vs. ISO 45001

March 13, 2025
Learn about the main differences between OHSAS 18001 and ISO 45001, and how ISO 45001 takes a proactive approach to prevent work-related incidents. Find out why businesses should...

Ensuring a Safer Workplace through a Comprehensive Contractor Qualification Framework

March 13, 2025
Avetta is a leader in contractor management, and with over 15 years of industry experience, we can help you establish a robust contractor pre-qualification program that aligns...

EQT Private Equity to Acquire Avetta from WCAS

March 13, 2025
EQT commits to supporting Avetta in its ongoing growth and innovation journey.

Guide to OSHA Workplace Lighting Requirements

March 13, 2025
Learn OSHA workplace lighting requirements to enhance safety, productivity, and quality. Discover standards, compliance benefits, and risks of non-compliance.

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!