Previous Lead Exposure Affects Workers

May 30, 2008
Older workers with past occupational exposure to lead face increased risk for recirculation of lead into their bloodstreams later in life, according to University of Pittsburgh researchers. Their study appears in the current issue of Archives of Environmental and Occupational Health.

"The neurotoxic effects of lead have been documented for over a century," said Lisa Morrow, Ph.D., lead author and associate professor of psychiatry and psychology at the Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic of University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. "Our study found that even workers with no current workplace exposure to lead – but who have had considerable past exposure – show increasing levels of lead in their blood as they age."

While state and federal standards that constitute safe exposure have lowered limits over the last decade or so, lead exposure continues to be widespread in the United States, with more than 1.4 million industrial workers having potential lead exposure.

Previous studies have shown that the amount of lead in the body increases throughout the life span, with 90 to 95 percent of that lead stored in the bones. With aging, bones demineralize and stored lead can be recirculated into the bloodstream.

Morrow's team studied 58 men, ranging from 40 to 76, with prior workplace exposure to lead. On average, none had worked with lead for the preceding 10 years. The older workers had the highest lead levels, meaning the combination of age and bone lead significantly predicted an increase in current blood lead levels. This suggests that lead from the bones is an important source of lead circulating in the blood. Older workers with prior exposure to lead may therefore face an additional neurotoxic hazard long after exposure has ended.

"Lead is a powerful neurotoxin that affects people of all ages,” Morrow said. “The most important target is the central nervous system. Increased measures to prevent exposure will be necessary to achieve the optimal goal of zero blood lead in the U.S. in the next decade.”

Morrow's study was supported by funding provided by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.

Sponsored Recommendations

Artificial Intelligence: What It Means for Safety and What's Next

Feb. 27, 2025
AI is changing the way many industries do business. Matt Law joins “The Case for Safety Podcast” to share how it’s impacting the safety profession.

10 Things Safety Professionals Should Know About Fire Sprinkler Systems

Feb. 27, 2025
From "The Incredibles" to "Changing Lanes," pop culture is full of myths about fire sprinkler systems. Expert Chris Butts helps set the record straight.

How to Improve Safety and Organizational Culture Through Risk Management

Feb. 27, 2025
By understanding and applying risk management concepts, you can improve safety and organizational culture — often with greater support from leadership.

Lithium-Ion Batteries: How to Overcome Current and Future Safety Challenges

Feb. 27, 2025
Lithium-ion batteries have helped usher in incredible technological advances from smartphones to electric vehicles — but they carry risks other batteries don't.

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!