Getty Images
OSHA-puzzle-pieces.jpg

OSHA Adds to Enforcement Weighting System

Oct. 28, 2019
Type of hazards and enforcement initiatives now part of measurement mix.

As of Oct. 1, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has begun using a new system for weighing and measuring its enforcement priorities that now includes added emphases depending on the type of hazard inspected and whether the actions were taken in pursuit of agency enforcement initiatives.

“Because weight will now be given to these areas, employers should be prepared for inspections related to high hazards and specific OSHA enforcement initiatives,” warn attorneys Jayni Lanham, Heidi Knight and Mark Duvall of the law firm of Beveridge & Diamond PC.

In its Sept. 27 announcement of the changes, OSHA said that it “will encourage the appropriate allocation of resources to support OSHA’s balanced approach of promoting safe and healthy workplaces, and continue to develop and support a management system that focuses enforcement activities on critical and strategic areas where the agency’s efforts can have the most impact.”

Under the new system, OSHA stressed that  it will be looking at more than just the time it takes to complete an inspection when evaluating its total enforcement activity for the year, which it measures in what it calls “Enforcement Units.”

Years ago, OSHA began measuring its enforcement activity by simply tallying up the total number of inspections completed each fiscal year. That approach changed in 2015 when the agency created its Enforcement Weighting System (EWS) to measure enforcement activity and no longer looked primarily at the total number of inspections.

In a 2015 memorandum to regional administrators, then-OSHA chief David Michaels announced implementation of a new system to “underscore the importance of the resource-intensive enforcement activity that is focused on some of the most hazardous workplace issues, such as ergonomics, heat, chemical exposures, workplace violence and process safety management.”

To do so, OSHA began measuring inspection activity by assigning varying Enforcement Units (EUs) to different types of inspections and measured its aggregate enforcement efforts by tallying those EUs. The severity and widespread nature of the charges that were brought against employers also were factors.

On the low end of the spectrum, non-formal complaint investigations and rapid response investigations would be assigned one-ninth EUs and on the high end of the spectrum, failing process safety management inspections would be assigned seven EUs and actions involving significant cases would be assigned eight EUs.

Under the new system adopted for fiscal year 2020, OSHA will continue to weight inspections but will consider factors, divided into five groupings:

● Group A includes criminal cases and significant cases and is assigned the highest number of EUs—seven.

● Group B includes fatalities, catastrophes and process safety management inspections and is assigned five EUs.

● Group C includes programmed inspections involving OSHA’s “focus four” high-priority hazards (such as those involving caught-in, electrical, fall and struck-by hazards) and is assigned three EUs.

● Group D includes programmed inspections under a number of emphasis programs (for example, amputation, combustible dust, workplace violence and heat hazards, Site-Specific Targeting, among others), and is assigned two EUs.

● All other inspections are encompassed by Group E and assigned one EU.

OSHA explained that it intends for these weighting system changes to “support a management system that focuses enforcement activities on critical and strategic areas where the agency’s efforts can have the most impact.”

“In light of this announcement, employers should expect OSHA’s inspection activity to reflect a renewed emphasis on high-hazard areas and OSHA’s enforcement initiatives,” according to the Beveridge & Diamond lawyers. “Employers should review their plans for preparing for and managing an OSHA inspection or develop a plan if one is not in place.”

Pre-planning for an OSHA inspection is a must. Executives responsible for safety management should work closely with key managers and supervisors in their workplaces to make sure everyone knows their role when OSHA inspectors show up at the door.

About the Author

David Sparkman

David Sparkman is founding editor of ACWI Advance (www.acwi.org), the newsletter of the American Chain of Warehouses Inc. He also heads David Sparkman Consulting, a Washington D.C. area public relations and communications firm. Prior to these he was director of industry relations for the International Warehouse Logistics Association. Sparkman has also been a freelance writer, specializing in logistics and freight transportation. He has served as vice president of communications for the American Moving and Storage Association, director of communications for the National Private Truck Council, and for two decades with American Trucking Associations on its weekly newspaper, Transport Topics.

Sponsored Recommendations

Navigating ESG Risk in Your Supply Chain

Sept. 26, 2024
Discover the role of ESG in supply chains, from reducing carbon footprints to complying with new regulations and enhancing long-term business value.

Understanding ESG Risks in the Supply Chain

Sept. 26, 2024
Understand the critical role of ESG in supply chains, the risks for hiring companies, and the competitive edge suppliers gain by prioritizing sustainability.

Best Practices for Managing Subcontractor Risk

Sept. 26, 2024
Discover how to effectively manage subcontractor risk with unified strategies, enhanced oversight, and clear communication for consistent safety and compliance.

Building a Culture of Support: Suicide Prevention and Mental Health in the Workplace

Sept. 26, 2024
Find best practices for setting up an organizational culture that promotes positive mental health and suicide prevention.

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!