CDC Study: MRSA Infections Connected to Animal Agriculture

Dec. 5, 2007
Despite mounting evidence that demonstrates certain strains of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) originate in animal agriculture and could pose a threat to agriculture workers, the United States does not test for the disease in cattle, pigs or other livestock used for food.

A recent Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) study reveals that the NT-MRSA, a strain of the affliction that first appeared in the Netherlands in 2003, makes up more than 20 percent of all MRSA cases in that country. NT-MRSA, which previously only affected pigs, has a high rate of hospitalization for humans.

In the Netherlands, NT-MRSA cases were prevalent in parts of the country containing pig and cattle farms, with pig and cattle farmers affected in especially high rates. Furthermore, Veterinary Microbiology recently published evidence of MRSA’s presence in Canadian pigs and pig farmers, suggesting animal agriculture industries may play a large role in harboring and spreading the disease, and that both animals and workers are at risk of infection.

Agricultural, medical and environmental experts urge Congress and the Food and Drug Administration to investigate MRSA’s connection to the agriculture industries and to determine if the nation’s cattle, poultry and swine may contribute to the spread of infection in humans.

Rebecca Goldburg, senior scientist at environmental defense, explained that the presence of antibiotics in animal feed could contribute to the problem.

“Antibiotic resistance is exploding in our hospitals and communities,” she said. “Medical experts point to the profligate use of antibiotics in animal feed as a significant cause, but those in charge of safeguarding our food system are mostly just whistling in the dark.”

In “The Preservation of Antibiotics for Medical Treatment Act,” a proposed bill supported by more than 350 health and agriculture groups, antibiotics relevant to human medicine would be phased out in their use as animal feed additives. The bill was sponsored by Senate Health Committee Chairman Edward Kennedy, D-Mass., along with Maine Republican Sens. Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins and Democratic Sens. Sherrod Brown, Ohio, and Jack Reed, R.I.

About the Author

Laura Walter

Laura Walter was formerly senior editor of EHS Today. She is a subject matter expert in EHS compliance and government issues and has covered a variety of topics relating to occupational safety and health. Her writing has earned awards from the American Society of Business Publication Editors (ASBPE), the Trade Association Business Publications International (TABPI) and APEX Awards for Publication Excellence. Her debut novel, Body of Stars (Dutton) was published in 2021.

Sponsored Recommendations

Unleashing the Power of Stories: Level-up Safety Culture with Three Easy Storytelling Tools

Jan. 3, 2025
Effective storytelling can shape a workplace culture and improve safety, especially in times of change when risk soars, hazards multiply and human factors threaten to derail progress...

4 Resources to Get Better Safety Performances From Supervisors

Jan. 3, 2025
Here is an overview of four of the best safety resources that safety folks can use as they consider how to get better safety performances from supervisors and workplace leaders...

4 Often Overlooked Types of New Workers—and the Different Dangers They Face

Jan. 3, 2025
This blog post is an adapted excerpt from the safety guide Fitting in Fast: Making a Safe Workplace for New Hires, which examines data and best practices regarding the protection...

4 Ways Frontline Supervisors Influence Workplace Safety

Jan. 3, 2025
These four areas determine whether frontline supervisors are having a positive or negative effect on workplace safety.

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!