Air Quality Measures Consistently Cost Less than Predicted

May 19, 2009
In December 1970, the Clean Air Act became law. A triumph of bipartisanship, the statute has delivered cleaner, healthier air to millions of Americans and has proved to be one of the most cost-effective regulatory programs in American history. EPA valued the total health benefits through 1990 at $22.2 trillion and the total compliance costs over the same years at $0.5 trillion, resulting in net monetary benefits of $21.7 trillion. The Clean Air Act continues to deliver these benefits, supplemented by the considerable health and environmental gains from the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990.

Each time EPA has considered new clean air standards, it has been challenged with claims that meeting the new standards would not be feasible, practical or affordable. A new fact sheet from the Environmental Defense Fund has shown that the reverse is true: Benefits have overwhelmed the costs, which have been consistently lower than predicted.

The cost of cleaning America's air has been consistently lower than projected. For example, Clean Air Act amendments were predicted to cost $104 billion per year. The actual figure is $22 billion per year, or 21 percent of the predicted cost. Low emissions vehicles were predicted to cost $1,500 more than comparable models. In reality, the additional cost is less than $100. Reformulated gasoline was predicted to increase the cost of a gallon of gas by 17 cents, when it actually increased the cost by 5.4 cents a gallon.

One of the most innovative aspects of the Clean Air Act is its cap-and-trade approach to reducing emissions of sulfur dioxide, a precursor to acid rain. Initial analyses of the program warned of high costs, but these fears were not realized. Acid rain SO2 reduction measures were predicted to cost $6 billion per year. The actual cost was 30 percent of that, or $1.8 billion.

In fact, the program demonstrates that properly designed, market-based approaches can reduce emissions ahead of schedule and at far lower cost than conventional command-and-control regulation. The cap-and-trade approach provides incentives to reduce emissions, leads to low-cost environmental results and turns pollution reductions into marketable assets.
Since its inception, the program has achieved 100 percent compliance in Phase I, reduced emissions at least 35 percent below 1990 levels and cost far less than projected.

About the Author

Sandy Smith

Sandy Smith is the former content director of EHS Today, and is currently the EHSQ content & community lead at Intelex Technologies Inc. She has written about occupational safety and health and environmental issues since 1990.

Sponsored Recommendations

Ensuring a Safer Workplace through a Comprehensive Contractor Qualification Framework

March 13, 2025
Avetta is a leader in contractor management, and with over 15 years of industry experience, we can help you establish a robust contractor pre-qualification program that aligns...

EQT Private Equity to Acquire Avetta from WCAS

March 13, 2025
EQT commits to supporting Avetta in its ongoing growth and innovation journey.

Guide to OSHA Workplace Lighting Requirements

March 13, 2025
Learn OSHA workplace lighting requirements to enhance safety, productivity, and quality. Discover standards, compliance benefits, and risks of non-compliance.

What is the difference between Tier 1, 2, and 3 suppliers and why do they matter?

March 13, 2025
From raw materials to final products, each supplier tier poses risks and liabilities that can impact your organization. Avetta's supply chain management software offers peace ...

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!