EPA Quits River Cleanup Talks With Dow

Jan. 7, 2008
EPA recently halted negotiations with Dow Chemical, claiming the company has not offered a deal representing comprehensive cleanup efforts of the dioxin-contaminated Tittabawassee River system.

The targeted area, beginning upstream of Dow’s Midland, Mich., facility and extending downstream to the Saginaw River, contains dioxins and furans, byproducts from the manufacture of chlorine-based products. EPA claims Dow’s past waste disposal practices, fugitive emissions and incineration resulted in on- and off-site dioxin and furan contamination.

EPA and Dow began negotiating in October under provisions of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, or Superfund, to reach a settlement on conducting a study and interim cleanup actions for the river system.

"EPA does not believe that the deal Dow is offering goes far enough,” said Ralph Dollhopf, associate director for the Superfund division of EPA's Regional Office in Chicago. “EPA simply will not accept any deal that is not comprehensive.”

"I am extremely disappointed with this outcome," said Regional Administrator Mary A. Gade. "EPA approached negotiations with high hopes and realistic expectations. Our team put in many long hours of good faith efforts that came to an unfortunate end today. EPA is now reviewing its options for ensuring that dioxin contamination in the river system and the Midland area can be fully addressed."

David Keplar, Dow’s senior vice president, said they didn’t understand why the agency decided to end the negotiations so “abruptly.”

“We were prepared to commit immense human and financial resources on early, comprehensive actions, all in full compliance with EPA guidance and regulations,” Keplar said. “This was a real opportunity to actually accelerate resolving the situation; now we’re faced with additional barriers and delays.”

The company emphasized that it remained committed to “clearly communicating and working with [the] community, EPA, the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) and other key stakeholders in this process.”

Dow spokesperson John Musser told OccupationalHazards.com that Dow submitted a “good faith” proposal Dec. 10, following negotiation discussions with EPA and MDEQ officials. EPA then extended negotiations for an additional 30 days.

On the day they were notified of EPA’s decision to end discussions, Dow was ready to submit a modified proposal, Musser said.

Sponsored Recommendations

Unleashing the Power of Stories: Level-up Safety Culture with Three Easy Storytelling Tools

Jan. 3, 2025
Effective storytelling can shape a workplace culture and improve safety, especially in times of change when risk soars, hazards multiply and human factors threaten to derail progress...

4 Resources to Get Better Safety Performances From Supervisors

Jan. 3, 2025
Here is an overview of four of the best safety resources that safety folks can use as they consider how to get better safety performances from supervisors and workplace leaders...

4 Often Overlooked Types of New Workers—and the Different Dangers They Face

Jan. 3, 2025
This blog post is an adapted excerpt from the safety guide Fitting in Fast: Making a Safe Workplace for New Hires, which examines data and best practices regarding the protection...

4 Ways Frontline Supervisors Influence Workplace Safety

Jan. 3, 2025
These four areas determine whether frontline supervisors are having a positive or negative effect on workplace safety.

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!