Teamsters' Hoffa Says U.S. Ports Should Have Same Security

March 15, 2006
The Teamsters Union believes that U.S. ports should have the same security standards as those governing American airports in this post-Sept. 11 era, arguing that the Transportation Security Agency (TSA) requires companies providing security operations to airports be owned and controlled by U.S. citizens, and should do the same for ports.

Despite the fact that Dubai Port World bowed out of major U.S. port operations, "our ports remain a national security nightmare," says Teamsters General President Jim Hoffa.

The security gaps from unchecked containers, inadequate fences and too-few Coast Guard cutters patrolling harbors need to be addressed, as well as port trucking operations, he said. The current system relies on hundreds of contractors and small motor carriers, making it nearly impossible to track who is going in and out of ports. Under these conditions, Hoffa frets that no one takes real responsibility for properly checking and training drivers. They are forced to work long hours for little pay. The solution, he adds, is for drivers to work as employees of companies that are carefully screened and regulated by port authorities. This would ensure security requirements are met.

"Americans should be just as concerned about who has access to our ports as we are about who is running the port," Hoffa asserts.

Recent reports by ABC News and the New York Times, citing the findings of a yet unreleased Homeland Security Department investigation into the New York and New Jersey ports, confirm that port trucking operations are a major security gap. The articles reported that the DHS investigation found:

  • Background checks were not conducted for most drivers given licenses at the New York and New Jersey ports;
  • About half of 9,000 truckers checked had criminal records, and many had been convicted of homicide, assault, weapons charges, sex offenses, arson, drug dealing, identity theft and cargo theft;
  • About 500 held bogus driver's licenses, leaving officials unsure of their real identities.

The DHS investigation of driver screening concluded there are "serious port security concerns and possible security gaps exposing vulnerabilities" that could be capitalized upon by terrorist organizations.

"The only way to ensure the security of our ports is to pass comprehensive port security legislation that deals with all the weaknesses of the system – not just one part of a chain with many weak links," Hoffa says.

About the Author

Sandy Smith

Sandy Smith is the former content director of EHS Today, and is currently the EHSQ content & community lead at Intelex Technologies Inc. She has written about occupational safety and health and environmental issues since 1990.

Sponsored Recommendations

June 23, 2025
Learn about lone working laws in the US, key hazards and risks, and get actionable advice on how to keep your lone workers safe.
June 23, 2025
Chemical substitution can quickly get messy, with unclear steps and the risk of swapping one hazard for another. This checklist helps you avoid costly mistakes, prioritize which...
June 23, 2025
This article covers the key steps to build a reliable SDS management program, from organizing your inventory and sourcing updated SDS to ensuring easy access and regular maintenance...
June 23, 2025
It's time to get a bit more granular and start to examine the types of metrics EHS departments should be tracking, starting with lost time injury frequency rate (LTIFR).

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!