What Does the Ergonomics Standard Do?

Nov. 21, 2000
At the center of the ergonomics controversy is a rule that is\r\ndesigned to protect workers from musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs).

At the center of the ergonomics controversy is a rule that is designed to protect workers from musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs), such as carpal tunnel syndrome or back injuries.

The rule requires all employers -- except those in the construction, agriculture, railroad and maritime industries -- to provide their workers with basic information about common MSDs and their signs and symptoms by Oct. 14, 2001.

The earlier proposed version of the standard required employers in the manufacturing and manual materials handling sectors to provide information to their employees, survey their workplaces to identify ergonomically hazardous tasks and create written programs to monitor or reduce identified hazards, a provision that is not in the final rule.

But the proposed rule allowed employers in general industry to take no action to comply with the rule until one employee had reported an MSD.

The final rule requires all covered employers to provide their employees with information about ergonomic hazards and MSDs.

The final rule requires additional steps by an employer only when an employee reports an MSD or signs or symptoms of an MSD.

When an employer receives a report of an MSD, the employer must determine whether the MSD is work-related.

If it is work-related and requires days away from work, restricted work or medical treatment beyond first aid, or involves signs or symptoms of an MSD that last seven consecutive days after the employee reports them, the employer is required to formally analyze the conditions that caused the MSD.

First, the employer must determine whether the MSD is "job-related."

An MSD can be "work-related" but not "job-related if it results from something that is not part of an employees routine duties, according to OSHA.

For example, if a clerical worker injures his back while lifting office furniture, the MSD is not job related.

Here are some other provisions of the standard regarding MSDs:

  • If an MSD is job-related, the employer must determine whether the job tasks involve any of five risk factors: repetition, force, awkward postures, contact stress and vibration. Examples of tasks that involve ergonomics risk factors include repeating the same motions every few seconds, using a keyboard or mouse for more than four hours a day, or working with elbows above the shoulders or hands above the head for more than two hours a day.
  • If the MSD is related to an ergonomic risk factor, the employer can manage the MSD with any combination of medical care, restricted work, time off work and job redesign. If the employer restricts an injured employee''s work, the employer must not change the worker''s rate of pay. If the employer tells the worker to take time off, the employer must pay at least 90 percent of the worker''s normal pay. The employ must maintain those rates of pay for 90 days. An employer can use an employee''s sick time or vacation time to cover wages during time off. In the earlier proposed version of the rule, pay for restricted work or time off was scheduled to continue for 180 days, and an employer could not charge any of it to a worker''s sick or vacation time.
  • The standard''s provisions for specific pay rates for injured workers are designed to ensure that workers report MSDs as soon as they occur. "Early reporting and intervention is essential to preventing permanent damage or disability," according to OSHA. "However, there is substantial evidence that, absent protection from economic loss, workers are reluctant to report injuries because they fear losing pay, being fired, or being subjected to other forms of discrimination. Knowing that they will not lose pay as a result of a necessary work absence will make employees more willing to come forward to report their injures."
  • If the condition that resulted in the MSD is determined to involve an ergonomic hazard, the employer must implement an ergonomics program that includes management leadership and employee participation, job controls, training and program evaluation.
  • Employers will have 60 days to complete an analysis of a job that may have caused an MSD and 90 days to implement initial controls to reduce the hazard.
  • During the first two years that the rule is in effect, it will be phased in gradually and employers will have up to four years to implement permanent controls to reduce or eliminate an ergonomic hazard. The phase-in period will end in January 2003. From then on, an employer that identifies an ergonomic hazard will have two year to implement permanent controls.

The standard includes detailed methods for analyzing a job''s ergonomic hazardousness, as well as guidelines that an employer must use to determine whether an ergonomics program is sufficient to result in compliance with the rules.

by Virginia Sutcliffe

About the Author

EHS Today Staff

EHS Today's editorial staff includes:

Dave Blanchard, Editor-in-Chief: During his career Dave has led the editorial management of many of Endeavor Business Media's best-known brands, including IndustryWeekEHS Today, Material Handling & LogisticsLogistics Today, Supply Chain Technology News, and Business Finance. In addition, he serves as senior content director of the annual Safety Leadership Conference. With over 30 years of B2B media experience, Dave literally wrote the book on supply chain management, Supply Chain Management Best Practices (John Wiley & Sons, 2021), which has been translated into several languages and is currently in its third edition. He is a frequent speaker and moderator at major trade shows and conferences, and has won numerous awards for writing and editing. He is a voting member of the jury of the Logistics Hall of Fame, and is a graduate of Northern Illinois University.

Adrienne Selko, Senior Editor: In addition to her roles with EHS Today and the Safety Leadership Conference, Adrienne is also a senior editor at IndustryWeek and has written about many topics, with her current focus on workforce development strategies. She is also a senior editor at Material Handling & Logistics. Previously she was in corporate communications at a medical manufacturing company as well as a large regional bank. She is the author of Do I Have to Wear Garlic Around My Neck?, which made the Cleveland Plain Dealer's best sellers list.

Nicole Stempak, Managing Editor:  Nicole Stempak is managing editor of EHS Today and conference content manager of the Safety Leadership Conference.

Sponsored Recommendations

Navigating ESG Risk in Your Supply Chain

Sept. 26, 2024
Discover the role of ESG in supply chains, from reducing carbon footprints to complying with new regulations and enhancing long-term business value.

Understanding ESG Risks in the Supply Chain

Sept. 26, 2024
Understand the critical role of ESG in supply chains, the risks for hiring companies, and the competitive edge suppliers gain by prioritizing sustainability.

Best Practices for Managing Subcontractor Risk

Sept. 26, 2024
Discover how to effectively manage subcontractor risk with unified strategies, enhanced oversight, and clear communication for consistent safety and compliance.

Building a Culture of Support: Suicide Prevention and Mental Health in the Workplace

Sept. 26, 2024
Find best practices for setting up an organizational culture that promotes positive mental health and suicide prevention.

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!