New Zealand Employer Ordered to Pay Workers Who Developed Muskuloskeletal Disorders

Dec. 20, 2005
The employer for two Wellington industrial process workers has been ordered to pay $10,000 (U.S. $6,912) to each worker after failing to protect them from developing a muskuloskeletal disorder referred to by the New Zealand Department of Labour as "occupational overuse syndrome" (OOS).

The two men worked for Millard Manufacturing Ltd. for 13 and 15 years respectively, making badges, buttons, belt buckles and other small, cast-metal objects, according to the agency. Their work involved buffing and polishing the metal objects by holding them against vibrating finishing wheels. This work accounted for about 80 percent of their jobs.

One man was diagnosed with carpal tunnel syndrome and the other diagnosed with hand-arm vibration syndrome, leaving them both with a long-term disability, according to the New Zealand Department of Labour.

The Department of Labour prosecuted Millard Manufacturing and its director, Howard Millard, for failing to ensure the workers' safety at work.

Over the space of many years, both men repeatedly had complained to the company about their injuries, but the director refused to accept they were work-related, and their work remained largely unchanged until they both left the company in 2004, according to the agency.

Department of Labour Health and Safety Manager for Wellington Alan Cooper said the two men suffered serious injuries over many years and their concerns were never appropriately addressed by Millard.

Millard Manufacturing and Millard admitted to three charges of failing to take all practicable steps to put health and safety systems in place, and failing to ensure the safety of the workers, and were ordered to pay reparations of $20,000 (U.S. $13,824).

Cooper said the prosecution was significant because it was one of the first involving industrial process workers suffering from OOS in New Zealand.

"While there have been several prosecutions for gradual process injuries relating to data entry and computer/VDU use, this prosecution shows that OOS isn't something that only office workers suffer from," Cooper said. "This type of light industrial process work is common in New Zealand. It's very important that companies with workers carrying out repetitive, manual work have health and safety systems in place that take in to account health risks associated with the work."

Exchange rates are as of Dec. 19.

Sponsored Recommendations

Unleashing the Power of Stories: Level-up Safety Culture with Three Easy Storytelling Tools

Jan. 3, 2025
Effective storytelling can shape a workplace culture and improve safety, especially in times of change when risk soars, hazards multiply and human factors threaten to derail progress...

4 Resources to Get Better Safety Performances From Supervisors

Jan. 3, 2025
Here is an overview of four of the best safety resources that safety folks can use as they consider how to get better safety performances from supervisors and workplace leaders...

4 Often Overlooked Types of New Workers—and the Different Dangers They Face

Jan. 3, 2025
This blog post is an adapted excerpt from the safety guide Fitting in Fast: Making a Safe Workplace for New Hires, which examines data and best practices regarding the protection...

4 Ways Frontline Supervisors Influence Workplace Safety

Jan. 3, 2025
These four areas determine whether frontline supervisors are having a positive or negative effect on workplace safety.

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!