OSHA Cites Three Contractors for Inadequate Cave-In Protection

June 4, 2001
OSHA cited three contractors for failing to provide adequate cave-in\r\nprotection for employees.

'

OSHA has cited three contractors from Maine and New Hampshire for alleged willful violations for failing to provide adequate cave-in protection for employees working in excavations at jobsites in Portsmouth, Manchester and Exeter, N.H.

Combined penalties totaling $65,900 have been proposed against the three employers.

S.E MacMillan Co., Inc., of Bangor, Maine, faces $36,900 in fines for:

  • having employees working in inadequately guarded trenches at a water line installation cite,
  • operating an excavator in such a way that it contacted an overhead powerline,
  • not having trench box specifications on site, and
  • not removing a damaged ladder from service.

R.D. Edmunds & Sons, Inc., of Franklin, N.H., faces $22,000 in fines for:

  • having employees work in an inadequately guarded trench at a water line installation cite
  • not having a set of plans for the shoring system approved by a professional engineer on site

Perm A Drive Paving Co., of Conway, N.H., faces $7,000 in fines for:

  • having its employees were working in inadequately guarded trenches at a sewer repair cite,
  • not providing a safe means of exit from the excavation, and
  • using a damaged synthetic web sling to lift a granite block.

"These citations reflect an all too common construction safety hazard," said David May, OSHA area director for New Hampshire, who noted that 36 American workers died in excavation collapses in 1998. "Particularly disturbing is the fact that, in all three cases, these employers knew cave-in protection was required for their employees, yet did not provide adequate safeguards for them."

May said excavation safety has long been a special emphasis for OSHA, with the agency often conducting spot inspections.

"Employers should not assume that OSHA won''t inspect their jobsite no matter where it is located," he said. "If OSHA inspectors encounter an excavation during their normal business travels, they will stop and examine it. If hazards, such as a lack of collapse protection, are observed, an inspection will be opened on the spot and violations will result in appropriate citations and fines. The simple fact is that no job, no deadline, is an excuse for failing to implement this standard, commonsense safeguard for workers."

OSHA standards require that excavations five feet or deeper must be protected against a collapse of their sidewalls. Collapse protection may be supplied by shoring the sidewalls, sloping the soil at a shallow angle or by proper use of a protective trench box.

Detailed information on identifying, evaluating and addressing excavation safety hazards is available through OSHA''s Web site, www.osha.gov. Click on "technical links," then click on "trenching and excavations."

by Melissa Martin

About the Author

EHS Today Staff

EHS Today's editorial staff includes:

Dave Blanchard, Editor-in-Chief: During his career Dave has led the editorial management of many of Endeavor Business Media's best-known brands, including IndustryWeekEHS Today, Material Handling & LogisticsLogistics Today, Supply Chain Technology News, and Business Finance. In addition, he serves as senior content director of the annual Safety Leadership Conference. With over 30 years of B2B media experience, Dave literally wrote the book on supply chain management, Supply Chain Management Best Practices (John Wiley & Sons, 2021), which has been translated into several languages and is currently in its third edition. He is a frequent speaker and moderator at major trade shows and conferences, and has won numerous awards for writing and editing. He is a voting member of the jury of the Logistics Hall of Fame, and is a graduate of Northern Illinois University.

Adrienne Selko, Senior Editor: In addition to her roles with EHS Today and the Safety Leadership Conference, Adrienne is also a senior editor at IndustryWeek and has written about many topics, with her current focus on workforce development strategies. She is also a senior editor at Material Handling & Logistics. Previously she was in corporate communications at a medical manufacturing company as well as a large regional bank. She is the author of Do I Have to Wear Garlic Around My Neck?, which made the Cleveland Plain Dealer's best sellers list.

Nicole Stempak, Managing Editor:  Nicole Stempak is managing editor of EHS Today and conference content manager of the Safety Leadership Conference.

Sponsored Recommendations

What is the key difference between OSHAS 18001 vs. ISO 45001

March 13, 2025
Learn about the main differences between OHSAS 18001 and ISO 45001, and how ISO 45001 takes a proactive approach to prevent work-related incidents. Find out why businesses should...

Ensuring a Safer Workplace through a Comprehensive Contractor Qualification Framework

March 13, 2025
Avetta is a leader in contractor management, and with over 15 years of industry experience, we can help you establish a robust contractor pre-qualification program that aligns...

EQT Private Equity to Acquire Avetta from WCAS

March 13, 2025
EQT commits to supporting Avetta in its ongoing growth and innovation journey.

Guide to OSHA Workplace Lighting Requirements

March 13, 2025
Learn OSHA workplace lighting requirements to enhance safety, productivity, and quality. Discover standards, compliance benefits, and risks of non-compliance.

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!