AIHce: Beyond Response to Readiness

May 11, 2004
Companies need to look beyond the ability to respond to emergencies to the ability to prepare for emergencies if they want to survive a business interruption, said John B. Copenhaver, and the best way to do that is for the departments managing security, emergency response, business continuity and crisis management to work together.

"There is a grave and urgent need to break down silos rather than patiently waiting for a seat at the big people's table," Copenhaver told attendees at the American Industrial Hygiene Conference and Exhibition (AIHce) in Atlanta. Safety and industrial hygiene professionals are accustomed to preventing injuries and illnesses, said Copenhaver, and business continuity planning is the process of developing advance plans to reduce the disruption to business should a computer virus, tornado, fire or terrorist strike a business.

"The goal is to protect critical business functions," said Copenhaver, senior vice president of Marsh Risk Consulting. "You want to minimize surprises after the big surprise that disrupts your business. Prevention is important, but what we can't prevent, we must be prepared for."

He noted that 60 percent of small businesses without a business continuity plan got out of business within five years of a business disruption. Only 15 percent of executives believe their business is prepared for a major disruption, he said, and one-quarter of security managers believe their department is underfunded.

He made particular note of backing up computer systems regularly, regardless of the cost, and ensuring business can continue if one facility or part of the facility is shut down due to some type of incident. It is important not only for the business, he noted, but for the employees.

"You are real scientists, identifying health and safety problems," Copenhaver told the audience. "I think we have a future together."

Companies need to have an inherent understanding of the importance of business continuity planning like they have for occupational safety and health, he noted. One protects employees, while the other protects the business. "Without productive and healthy employees, the business can't go anywhere," said Copenhaver. Conversely, a business that can't continue to exist following some type of disaster can't support employees or its community.

"The real cost" of a business disaster "is measured in families and faces," said Copenhaver. "Real people who could lose their jobs and even their lives if you and I don't do our jobs."

About the Author

Sandy Smith

Sandy Smith is the former content director of EHS Today, and is currently the EHSQ content & community lead at Intelex Technologies Inc. She has written about occupational safety and health and environmental issues since 1990.

Sponsored Recommendations

Avetta Named a Leader in The Verdantix Green Quadrant: Supply Chain Sustainability Software 2024

Nov. 26, 2024
Avetta was named a leader by Verdantix in a 2024 sustainability software report for our ability to help clients and suppliers build sustainable supply chains.

Avetta is a Leader in Supply Chain Sustainability Software

Nov. 26, 2024
Verdantix has named Avetta a leader in its 2024 Green Quadrant for Supply Chain Sustainability Software. Download the report for independent insights into market trends and top...

The Power of Benchmarking in Procurement: Driving Success and Strategic Planning

Nov. 26, 2024
Explore the strategic impact of benchmarking in procurement to drive success and plan effectively.

What We Can Learn From OSHA's 2024 Top 10 Safety Violations

Nov. 26, 2024
Learn what OSHA’s 2024 top 10 incident list reveals about the limitations of compliance and the need for proactive, continual safety improvement.

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!