Ford Ignored Safety Studies

Jan. 31, 2000
An explosion and fire that killed six workers at Ford Motor Co. could have been avoided if safety recommendations from several engineering studies were followed.

An explosion and fire that killed six Ford Motor Co. workers last year could have been prevented if the company had followed safety recommendations in several engineering studies, The Detroit News reported Friday.

Studies in years prior to the explosion at the River Rouge Complex said safety equipment on boilers needed to be replaced, according to company records.

A boiler inside the plant in suburban Dearborn, jointly owned by Ford and Rouge Industries Inc., exploded Feb. 1, killing the employees and injuring 34 others.

An investigation revealed that the blast was caused by a buildup of natural gas in the boiler, which lacked adequate controls for shutting it down safely.

According to company records provided to state regulators and obtained by the News, Black & Veatch was hired by Ford in 1987 to study the power plant's boilers, installed in 1966.

Black & Veatch suggested replacing the boilers' controls, a job estimated at $10.2 million. Ford, according to a memo sent to the powerhouse's operating committee, did not want to upgrade the boilers because doing so would have required the company to comply with modern safety regulations, the newspaper said.

In 1990, a second company hired by Ford, Industrial Risk Insurers, suggested using combustion controls and venting with the boiler systems.

Ford engineers shut down two such safety devices six months after installing the boilers in 1966, saying they never worked well.

The recommendations were repeated in follow-up studies in 1996, 1997 and 1998. A third firm, Sargent & Lundy, in February 1998 also recommended replacing the boiler's controls.

James Padilla, Ford vice president for manufacturing, said following the advice in the engineering studies would not necessarily have prevented the accident.

"The idea that we were this big sleeping giant isn't true," he said. "`Our health and safety standards stand up reasonably well with industry standards."

He declined comment on why the recommendations were never followed.

"Clearly, the accident wouldn't have happened"' if they had followed those steps, said Chuck Lorish with OSHA in Michigan.

Ford officials said that since the accident at the Rouge complex, the company has spent millions of dollars on upgrading safety systems at its facilities nationwide.

The explosion shut down the complex's primary operations for more then three months.

Ford was fined $1.5 million following the accident. The company also paid about $30 million to settle lawsuits and agreed to give $5 million to researchers and hospital burn units.

About the Author

EHS Today Staff

EHS Today's editorial staff includes:

Dave Blanchard, Editor-in-Chief: During his career Dave has led the editorial management of many of Endeavor Business Media's best-known brands, including IndustryWeekEHS Today, Material Handling & LogisticsLogistics Today, Supply Chain Technology News, and Business Finance. In addition, he serves as senior content director of the annual Safety Leadership Conference. With over 30 years of B2B media experience, Dave literally wrote the book on supply chain management, Supply Chain Management Best Practices (John Wiley & Sons, 2021), which has been translated into several languages and is currently in its third edition. He is a frequent speaker and moderator at major trade shows and conferences, and has won numerous awards for writing and editing. He is a voting member of the jury of the Logistics Hall of Fame, and is a graduate of Northern Illinois University.

Adrienne Selko, Senior Editor: In addition to her roles with EHS Today and the Safety Leadership Conference, Adrienne is also a senior editor at IndustryWeek and has written about many topics, with her current focus on workforce development strategies. She is also a senior editor at Material Handling & Logistics. Previously she was in corporate communications at a medical manufacturing company as well as a large regional bank. She is the author of Do I Have to Wear Garlic Around My Neck?, which made the Cleveland Plain Dealer's best sellers list.

Nicole Stempak, Managing Editor:  Nicole Stempak is managing editor of EHS Today and conference content manager of the Safety Leadership Conference.

Sponsored Recommendations

March 13, 2025
Learn about the main differences between OHSAS 18001 and ISO 45001, and how ISO 45001 takes a proactive approach to prevent work-related incidents. Find out why businesses should...
March 13, 2025
Avetta is a leader in contractor management, and with over 15 years of industry experience, we can help you establish a robust contractor pre-qualification program that aligns...
March 13, 2025
EQT commits to supporting Avetta in its ongoing growth and innovation journey.
March 13, 2025
Learn OSHA workplace lighting requirements to enhance safety, productivity, and quality. Discover standards, compliance benefits, and risks of non-compliance.

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!