House Panel Praises and Queries OSHA, MSHA, NIOSH

April 8, 2005
Critical questions about delays in OSHA rulemaking marred an otherwise friendly reception when the leaders of the federal government's three workplace safety and health agencies appeared before a House appropriations subcommittee on April 7.

Ostensibly the hearing was about the administration's fiscal year 2006 budget request, but the subject of money never arose as Republican members of the panel praised OSHA, the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) and the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) for emphasizing education, compliance assistance and other business-friendly voluntary programs.

"We didn't get a lot of complaints about OSHA, so you must be doing something right," Ralph Regula, R-Ohio, told Acting OSHA Administrator Jonathan Snare, after Snare completed his testimony. Regula chairs the House Subcommittee on Labor, Health, and Human Services and Education.

"I think MSHA is doing a wonderful job," asserted Rep. Don Sherwood, R-Pa., another subcommittee member. Sherwood praised the agency, and Acting Administrator David Dye, for working with employers and miners to improve safety by offering compliance assistance while "still getting the production out."

The only Democrat to speak at the hearing, Rep. Lucille Roybal-Allard of California, raised the only critical questions about the agencies' performance.

Roybal-Allard asked NIOSH Director John Howard about a 3-year delay in implementing 40 recommendations NIOSH developed for the Department of Labor in order to improve workplace protections for young workers. Howard said NIOSH has worked with the Labor Department's Wage and Hour Division on implementing the recommendations.

But the California Democrat spent most of her time challenging Snare about a 6-year-old proposed rule that would clarify when employers must pay for their employees' personal protective equipment.

"Why has OSHA failed to finalize this rule?" asked Roybal-Allard. "Will it take you another 6 years?"

Snare replied that "the issues raised by the rulemaking are complicated …[the rule] is currently under active consideration." But his inability to give a specific date when the standard would be issued did not satisfy the congresswoman.

"That's the same answer I get every year," countered Roybal-Allard.

Sponsored Recommendations

Unleashing the Power of Stories: Level-up Safety Culture with Three Easy Storytelling Tools

Jan. 3, 2025
Effective storytelling can shape a workplace culture and improve safety, especially in times of change when risk soars, hazards multiply and human factors threaten to derail progress...

4 Resources to Get Better Safety Performances From Supervisors

Jan. 3, 2025
Here is an overview of four of the best safety resources that safety folks can use as they consider how to get better safety performances from supervisors and workplace leaders...

4 Often Overlooked Types of New Workers—and the Different Dangers They Face

Jan. 3, 2025
This blog post is an adapted excerpt from the safety guide Fitting in Fast: Making a Safe Workplace for New Hires, which examines data and best practices regarding the protection...

4 Ways Frontline Supervisors Influence Workplace Safety

Jan. 3, 2025
These four areas determine whether frontline supervisors are having a positive or negative effect on workplace safety.

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!