NOIRS: Are Emergency Responders Willing and Able to Respond?

Oct. 30, 2003
A recent study of 5,000 healthcare-based emergency responders such as doctors, nurses and emergency room technicians uncovered some interesting facts: many hospitals have no idea if their workers were able to respond to an emergency situation (trained to an emergency response plan) or if they were even willing to respond to an emergency.

According to researcher Robyn Gershon, MHS, DRPH, a professor at the Mailman School of Public Health at Columbia University, one-third of the responders surveyed were married to another responder; 54 percent were responsible for the care of children; and 27 percent said they were responsible for the care of elderly relatives.

Gershon, speaking at the National Occupational Injury Research Symposium 2003 (NOIRS), held this week in Pittsburgh, said her findings indicated responders had barriers to their ability to respond to an emergency, as well as barriers to their willingness to respond.

All in all, said Gershon, workers said their ability to respond would be limited by transportation (32 percent); care of children (30 percent); personal health (5 percent); care of elderly relatives (11 percent0; and pet care (5 percent). Their willingness to respond would be limited by fear for family (47 percent); fear for self (30 percent); their own health (13 percent).

Responders were asked about their ability and willingness to respond to specific emergencies. Most said they would be able (82 percent) and willing (85 percent) to respond to an explosion, while 80 percent said they would be able and 84 percent said they would be willing to respond to a fire. Less than half said they'd be able to respond to a snowstorm, but 80 percent said they'd be willing to respond during such an event. More than two-thirds of the respondents said they'd be willing and able to respond to a chemical event, and more than half said they'd be willing to respond to an emergency involving exposure to radiation. However, said Gershon, she was surprised to learn that fewer than half the respondents would be willing to respond to an event involving SARS. "I guess because they know so little about it," noted Gershon, although she admitted that education is not always key in increasing willingess to respond.

"The more knowledge they [study respondents] had about biological terror incidents, the less willing they were to respond," she noted. "And they more they heard about the side effects of the smallpox vaccination, the less willing they were to take it."

According to Gershon, "Effective emergency response requires system capacity; appropriate, effective emergency plans; and a competent, available workforce."

About the Author

Sandy Smith

Sandy Smith is the former content director of EHS Today, and is currently the EHSQ content & community lead at Intelex Technologies Inc. She has written about occupational safety and health and environmental issues since 1990.

Sponsored Recommendations

Avetta Named a Leader in The Verdantix Green Quadrant: Supply Chain Sustainability Software 2024

Nov. 26, 2024
Avetta was named a leader by Verdantix in a 2024 sustainability software report for our ability to help clients and suppliers build sustainable supply chains.

Avetta is a Leader in Supply Chain Sustainability Software

Nov. 26, 2024
Verdantix has named Avetta a leader in its 2024 Green Quadrant for Supply Chain Sustainability Software. Download the report for independent insights into market trends and top...

The Power of Benchmarking in Procurement: Driving Success and Strategic Planning

Nov. 26, 2024
Explore the strategic impact of benchmarking in procurement to drive success and plan effectively.

What We Can Learn From OSHA's 2024 Top 10 Safety Violations

Nov. 26, 2024
Learn what OSHA’s 2024 top 10 incident list reveals about the limitations of compliance and the need for proactive, continual safety improvement.

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!