New Report Examines Teamwork and Stress

Dec. 12, 2001
A new report shows that teamworking can both increase and decrease work-related stress levels, depending on how it's structured by employers.

A new report from the UK's Health and Safety Executive (HSE) shows that teamworking can both increase and decrease work-related stress levels, depending on the team design and methods of implementation adopted by employers. A team involves more than a group of people working near to each other.

The study defined teamwork as groups of employees who work collaboratively together, coordinating inter-dependent activities, in order to achieve shared goals. Such team working is increasingly common within modern companies as they strive to be more flexible, cost-effective and innovative, according to researchers. The mid-1990s saw 55 percent of UK manufacturers using teamworking, and this usage is expected to increase.

The review identifies two differing views of teamwork. One view states that successful teamworking can reduce employees' work-related stress through enabling greater control over their work environment and increasing job challenge. On the other hand, there is a danger that team working could escalate employee stress levels through increasing workload and raising uncertainty about what is expected of employees under a new approach.

A model for understanding teamworking has been created for the study, showing that teams can be successful if they have a positive impact on aspects such as job autonomy, skill variety and feedback. In contrast, teams that remove job discretion and increase workload are likely to have negative effects for employees. This can be the case with "lean production teams" involving employees working together on tightly-linked tasks that have highly standardized methods.

In addition, the model suggests that employee well-being can be better safe-guarded by designing an appropriate context within which teams work, particularly with regard to an appropriate team design, an effective implementation process, and a supportive culture.

In the context of the model, researchers report on the results of three studies, each examining a different type of production team:

  • Study A is a longitudinal study of the effects of implementing flexible work teams in a wire-making company.
  • Study B is a longitudinal study of lean production teams in a vehicle manufacturing company.
  • Study C is an investigation of self-managed teams in a chemical processing company.

"Implementing team working is implicitly neither good nor bad for employee well-being. Rather, the effects of team working will depend on a number of organizational, design, strategic, individual, and implementation factors," said Dr. Helen Williams, one of the authors of the report.

The important point, said Williams, is that companies need to recognize that they can make choices that have important consequences for employee well-being. "By pro-actively considering the factors outlined in the report, employers can make choices that enrich employees' work characteristics and thereby promote mental health at work. Employers need to be fully informed about the choices available to them, and the consequences of these choices," Williams added.

Copies of "Effective Teamworking: Reducing the Psychosocial Risks" can be ordered online at www.hsebooks.co.uk or are available from HSE Books, PO Box 1999, Sudbury, Suffolk, CO10 2WA.

HSE's Contract Research Reports are available on the HSE Web site at www.hse.gov.uk/research/content/crr/index.htm.

edited by Sandy Smith ([email protected])

About the Author

EHS Today Staff

EHS Today's editorial staff includes:

Dave Blanchard, Editor-in-Chief: During his career Dave has led the editorial management of many of Endeavor Business Media's best-known brands, including IndustryWeekEHS Today, Material Handling & LogisticsLogistics Today, Supply Chain Technology News, and Business Finance. In addition, he serves as senior content director of the annual Safety Leadership Conference. With over 30 years of B2B media experience, Dave literally wrote the book on supply chain management, Supply Chain Management Best Practices (John Wiley & Sons, 2021), which has been translated into several languages and is currently in its third edition. He is a frequent speaker and moderator at major trade shows and conferences, and has won numerous awards for writing and editing. He is a voting member of the jury of the Logistics Hall of Fame, and is a graduate of Northern Illinois University.

Adrienne Selko, Senior Editor: In addition to her roles with EHS Today and the Safety Leadership Conference, Adrienne is also a senior editor at IndustryWeek and has written about many topics, with her current focus on workforce development strategies. She is also a senior editor at Material Handling & Logistics. Previously she was in corporate communications at a medical manufacturing company as well as a large regional bank. She is the author of Do I Have to Wear Garlic Around My Neck?, which made the Cleveland Plain Dealer's best sellers list.

Nicole Stempak, Managing Editor:  Nicole Stempak is managing editor of EHS Today and conference content manager of the Safety Leadership Conference.

Sponsored Recommendations

Avetta Named a Leader in The Verdantix Green Quadrant: Supply Chain Sustainability Software 2024

Nov. 26, 2024
Avetta was named a leader by Verdantix in a 2024 sustainability software report for our ability to help clients and suppliers build sustainable supply chains.

Avetta is a Leader in Supply Chain Sustainability Software

Nov. 26, 2024
Verdantix has named Avetta a leader in its 2024 Green Quadrant for Supply Chain Sustainability Software. Download the report for independent insights into market trends and top...

The Power of Benchmarking in Procurement: Driving Success and Strategic Planning

Nov. 26, 2024
Explore the strategic impact of benchmarking in procurement to drive success and plan effectively.

What We Can Learn From OSHA's 2024 Top 10 Safety Violations

Nov. 26, 2024
Learn what OSHA’s 2024 top 10 incident list reveals about the limitations of compliance and the need for proactive, continual safety improvement.

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!