Company Agrees to Pay Reduced OSHA Fine

Jan. 29, 2003
Occupationalhazards.com often posts articles discussing proposed OSHA penalties and fines, but what happens once the agency issues citations?

OSHA gives companies 15 days to agree to the penalties, request an informal hearing with the area OSHA director or contest the fines and citations before the independent Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission.

Here's a follow-up to an article posted on the Web site on Jan. 15 titled, "Syracuse, NY Company Needs to 'Venture' Toward Safety."

Following negotiations with OSHA, New Venture Gear, the company featured in the article, agreed to pay nearly $87,000 in fines for exposing employees an extensive list of safety hazards, including unguarded moving machinery and electrocution hazards. OSHA originally proposed fines of $133,500.

The OSHA area director, Diane Brayden, called the settlment an "amicable resolution," adding that although the fine has been reduced, the 32 citations issued by OSHA will stand.

OSHA conducted an inspection of the company from Aug. 6 through Jan. 3, as part of its "site-specific targeting program," under which it inspects certain worksites with high rates of lost workday injuries and illnesses. The company was previously inspected in 1999 under a similar program and was issued citations with a proposed penalty of more than $100,000 at that time.

According to Brayden, 27 of the citations were classified as serious. Examples include failure to provide fall protection on aerial lifts, failure to maintain dry floors and failure to guard floor openings. Poor maintenance was also cited for ladders and stairs, fire extinguishers, exits, forklifts and slings, as well as failure to provide guarding on grinders, shafts, belts and pulleys and to maintain electrical equipment, conduit and flexible cords and guard electrical equipment.

Three alleged "repeat" violations included the company's failure to maintain overhead hoists, below the hook lifting devices and bridge rails; inadequately guarded moving parts on machinery; and inadequately guarded points of operation on machinery. Two alleged "other-than-serious" violations were issued for the company's failure to provide adequate general housekeeping and to properly maintain stairway treads.

"Their focus at the facility was on correcting conditions after they had caused an accident with an injury rather than being more proactive and looking for conditions that could cause injury if left uncorrected. That's being turned around at this point," said Brayden.

About the Author

Sandy Smith

Sandy Smith is the former content director of EHS Today, and is currently the EHSQ content & community lead at Intelex Technologies Inc. She has written about occupational safety and health and environmental issues since 1990.

Sponsored Recommendations

Committing to Safety: Why Leadership’s Role in Safety Excellence is Key

Jan. 13, 2025
Leadership has the power to transform an organization through their behavior and vision, which can result in the creation of an organizational culturethat supports safety excellence...

Speak Up! Cementing "See Something, Say Something" to Drive Safety

Jan. 13, 2025
Many organizations promote "see something, say something" to encourage their people to intervene and make work safe. But most don't go far enough to equip teams with the skills...

The Truth and Challenges of Cultivating Chronic Unease

Jan. 13, 2025
DEKRA announces its latest white paper, “The Truth and Challenges of Cultivating Chronic Unease,” as a definitive look into why being vulnerable to incidents strengthens our commitment...

Can you identify combustible dust?

Jan. 13, 2025
Are you looking for something interesting for a safety meeting? Download our infographic on Can You Identify Combustible Dust.

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!