BP Texas City Refinery Contests OSHA Citations

BP Products North America Inc. is contesting all citations proposed by OSHA on Oct. 30, including alleged violations and proposed penalties, abatement actions and abatement dates, and stressed that the company has taken significant steps to improve process safety performance.

Article Tools

  • Bookmark

OSHA proposed a record-breaking $87 million in penalties for BP’s alleged failure to correct serious health and safety standards at its Texas City, Texas, refinery, the location a fatal 2005 explosion that killed 15 workers and injured more than 170.

Of the proposed penalties, $56.7 million is attributed to an alleged 270 failures for BP to comply fully with the 2005 OSHA Settlement Agreement reached after the refinery explosion. That matter presently is before the Occupational Health & Safety Review Commission, a body that is independent of OSHA.

“We are disappointed that OSHA took this action in advance of the full consideration of the Review Commission,” said Texas City Refinery Manager Keith Casey. “We continue to believe we are in full compliance with the settlement agreement, and we look forward to demonstrating that before the review commission. While we strongly disagree with OSHA’s conclusions, we will continue to work with the agency to resolve our differences.”  

In addition, OSHA also cited BP $30.7 million for 439 new willful violations.

BP added that from the outset, the company has cooperated with OSHA in the agency’s review of the company’s Texas City operations and has considered the process a key input to the refinery’s compliance and safety programs.

“We believe our efforts at the Texas City refinery to improve process safety performance have been among the most strenuous and comprehensive that the refining industry has ever seen,” Casey said. “We remain committed to further enhancing our safety and compliance systems and achieving our goal of becoming an industry leader in process safety.”

Meanwhile, U.S. Rep. George Miller, D-Calif., chairman of the House Education and Labor Committee, released a statement saying the proposed penalties show “OSHA is taking the agency’s enforcement responsibilities seriously.”

“These citations are deeply disturbing given earlier commitments to improve conditions after the 2005 tragedy that caused massive death and injury at the Texas City, Texas, refinery. I commend OSHA for taking actions to prevent another devastating explosion,” Miller said.

Want to use this article? Click here for options!
© 2010 Penton Media Inc.

Acceptable Use Policy comments powered by Disqus

SafetyLive TV

SafetyLive TV

Check out SafetyLive TV now!

Tune in daily to see company video programs, product demonstrations, reports from industry trade shows and interviews with newsmakers.

Featured Videos:

MCR Safety Logo

MCR Safety - Making Safety a LifeStyle

MCR Safety’s Professional Grade PPE delivers a higher standard for consumers that demand the very best in safety.

More Videos

Online Resources

Webinars

Legislated ergonomics standard or not, recession or boom time, companies are realizing the benefits of integrating a sustainable ergonomics process within their business operations. The approach to managing and reducing ergonomic injuries and their costs vary widely. Register Now


More Webinars

Podcasts

Learn about ISO 16602, the international standard that classifies chemical protective clothing performance.

Listen now.

More Podcasts

eNews

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit ruled that in the case of Elaine Chao v. Summit Contractors, OSHA regulation 29 C.F.R. Sec. 1910.12(a) “is unambiguous in that it does not preclude OSHA from issuing citations to employers for violations when their own employees are not exposed to any hazards related to the violations.”

Read Entire Issue

Pop Quiz


Entries with a 100% score are automatically entered into a drawing for a $50 Visa Gift Card!

Take the pop quiz!

What You're Saying

Featured Suppliers