Image

OSHA Orders Trucking Company to Withdraw 'Retaliatory Lawsuit' Against Whistleblowers

Oct. 24, 2013
The agency also has ordered Palumbo Trucking to pay the whistleblowers $60,000 and take other corrective actions.

OSHA said it has ordered North Branford, Conn.-based Palumbo Trucking Inc. and owner David Palumbo "to withdraw a retaliatory lawsuit filed against two former workers of the commercial motor carrier who raised safety concerns."

The agency also has ordered Palumbo to pay the whistleblowers $60,000 and take other corrective actions.

"Filing a baseless, retaliatory lawsuit against workers who engaged in protected activity has a profound, chilling effect," said Marthe Kent, OSHA's New England regional administrator.

"It can intimidate workers into remaining silent about safety and health concerns that could have consequences for them and others on the road."

The order comes on the heels of an OSHA investigation, which determined that the company violated the whistleblower-protection provisions of the Surface Transportation Assistance Act when it filed a lawsuit against two former workers – a mechanic and a driver – who had registered complaints about a potentially unsafe truck with the North Branford Police Department and the Connecticut Department of Motor Vehicles in September 2012.

While the workers were discharged from employment for reasons unrelated to their protected activities, according to OSHA, the company subsequently filed a lawsuit against the two workers in the Superior Court of Connecticut on Jan. 7, 2013, alleging that they intentionally and maliciously filed the complaint with the North Branford Police Department.

In addition to ordering the withdrawal of the lawsuit, the order requires Palumbo to pay each worker $20,000 in punitive damages for the filing and litigating of a lawsuit that was solely intended to retaliate against activities protected by the Surface Transportation Assistance Act, as well as $10,000 each in compensatory damages for mental anguish, emotional distress, pain and suffering.

Additionally, the company must pay reasonable attorneys' fees to the complainants, provide the former workers a neutral job reference and post a notice on its job site and provide fact sheets to its workers notifying them of their rights under the Surface Transportation Assistance Act.

The company or the complainants can file objections or request a hearing before the department's Office of Administrative Law Judges within 30 days of receipt of OSHA's order.

Sponsored Recommendations

Committing to Safety: Why Leadership’s Role in Safety Excellence is Key

Jan. 13, 2025
Leadership has the power to transform an organization through their behavior and vision, which can result in the creation of an organizational culturethat supports safety excellence...

Speak Up! Cementing "See Something, Say Something" to Drive Safety

Jan. 13, 2025
Many organizations promote "see something, say something" to encourage their people to intervene and make work safe. But most don't go far enough to equip teams with the skills...

The Truth and Challenges of Cultivating Chronic Unease

Jan. 13, 2025
DEKRA announces its latest white paper, “The Truth and Challenges of Cultivating Chronic Unease,” as a definitive look into why being vulnerable to incidents strengthens our commitment...

Can you identify combustible dust?

Jan. 13, 2025
Are you looking for something interesting for a safety meeting? Download our infographic on Can You Identify Combustible Dust.

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!