Thinkstock
Case Farms Processing Inc is a leading supplier of chicken to national fast food and supermarket brands For employees the dangers of amputation electrocution and hazardous falls are all in a day39s work and part of their employer39s long history of violating federal worker safety and health standards

Chicken Processor Faces $861K in OSHA Fines for Exposing Workers to Hazards

Aug. 24, 2015
OSHA inspectors found that workers at Case Farms Processing continue to be exposed to serious amputation, electrocution and fall hazards.

Case Farms Processing is no stranger to OSHA, having been inspected 66 times since 1988 and having received hundreds of citations as a result of those inspections. OSHA claims the company “ignores dangers,” and has again cited the company, this time with 55 violations.

Case Farms Processing Inc. is a leading supplier of chicken to national fast food and supermarket brands. For employees, the dangers of amputation, electrocution and hazardous falls are all in a day's work, and part of their employer's long history of violating federal worker safety and health standards.

Acting on a referral, OSHA cited the company on Aug. 13 for two willful, 20 repeat, 30 serious and three other-than-serious safety and health violations at its Winesburg, Ohio facility. OSHA assessed $861,500 in penalties and added the company to the agency's Severe Violator Enforcement Program.

“Case Farms is an outrageously dangerous place to work. In the past 25 years, Case Farms has been cited for more than 350 safety and health violations,” said Dr. David Michaels, assistant secretary of labor for occupational safety and Health. “Despite committing to OSHA that it would eliminate serious hazards, Case Farms continues to endanger the safety and health of its workers. This simply must stop.”

The February 2015 inspection that resulted in the Aug. 13 citations found:

  • Amputation hazards.
  • Fall hazards due to non-functioning fall-arrest systems, unprotected platforms and wet work surfaces.
  • Lack of personal protective equipment.
  • Numerous violations of electrical safety standards.
  • Improperly stored oxygen cylinders.
  • Lack of emergency eye-wash stations.

Extensive History of OSHA Violations

Case Farms has an extensive history of health and safety violations. Since 1988, OSHA and the Occupational Safety and Health Division of North Carolina's Department of Labor have inspected the company 66 times at its facilities in North Carolina and Ohio, with citations issued in 42 of those inspections. A majority of the inspections were initiated after worker injuries, complaints or referrals.

In 2013, the company agreed to address safety violations in a settlement agreement with OSHA after being cited for exposing workers to dangerous machinery and other hazards at its Winesburg facility. However, follow-up inspections led to the issuance of citations on May 28 for one willful violation, four repeat violations, one serious violation and one other-than-serious violation. The hazards addressed by those citations include failing to ensure machines had safety guards to protect workers and allowing electrical hazards. Case Farms has contested those citations. In addition, OSHA is currently investigating Case Farms facilities in Canton, Ohio, after receiving reports of employee injuries there.

Current citations on Case Farms are available here.

Headquartered in Troutman, N.C., Case Farms Processing processes 2.8 million chickens per week at seven facilities in North Carolina and Ohio. It has more than 3,200 employees and produces more than 900 million pounds of fresh, partially cooked and frozen-for-export poultry products yearly. Its Ohio facilities are located in Canton, Strasburg, Massillon and Winesburg. In North Carolina, Case Farms operates in Dudley, Goldsboro, Mount Olive and Morganton.

The company has 15 business days from receipt of its citations and penalties to comply, request an informal conference with OSHA's area director or contest the findings before the independent Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission.

About the Author

Sandy Smith

Sandy Smith is the former content director of EHS Today, and is currently the EHSQ content & community lead at Intelex Technologies Inc. She has written about occupational safety and health and environmental issues since 1990.

Sponsored Recommendations

Unleashing the Power of Stories: Level-up Safety Culture with Three Easy Storytelling Tools

Jan. 3, 2025
Effective storytelling can shape a workplace culture and improve safety, especially in times of change when risk soars, hazards multiply and human factors threaten to derail progress...

4 Resources to Get Better Safety Performances From Supervisors

Jan. 3, 2025
Here is an overview of four of the best safety resources that safety folks can use as they consider how to get better safety performances from supervisors and workplace leaders...

4 Often Overlooked Types of New Workers—and the Different Dangers They Face

Jan. 3, 2025
This blog post is an adapted excerpt from the safety guide Fitting in Fast: Making a Safe Workplace for New Hires, which examines data and best practices regarding the protection...

4 Ways Frontline Supervisors Influence Workplace Safety

Jan. 3, 2025
These four areas determine whether frontline supervisors are having a positive or negative effect on workplace safety.

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!