OSHA’s Warning on Safety Incentive Programs Are Wide of the Mark

I’ve spent more than 40 years in safety and believe that at the end of the day, most companies want to keep their employees safe and act in good faith to motivate them to follow the rules.

What is in this article?:

More About:

Some good-faith efforts by employers to motivate employees to work safely are running afoul of OSHA, which believes that rewards like a pizza party to celebrate a safety milestone actually may provide a disincentive for employees to report injuries. However, in an attempt to clarify its position, OSHA has cast a net that is too wide and only will lead to confusion over how a company may use incentives to motivate workers.

I am not in any way suggesting that companies cover up injuries or punish employees who report them. Nor do I believe that safety incentive programs really work. (More on that in a bit.) But companies that choose to use those programs in good faith deserve better guidance from OSHA.

What  the  Memo Says

OSHA's latest memo warned employers that rewards programs unintentionally – or perhaps even intentionally – could encourage employees not to report injuries.

Among the examples OSHA cited as potential violations: programs in which all employees were entered into a prize drawing or received bonuses if their work group remained safe over a period of time. Even supervisor bonuses for lowering injury rates have been declared suspect. Rewards programs that don't follow OSHA guidelines could lead to violations of recordkeeping rules or violations for discriminating against an employee who reports an injury.

OSHA recommended employers instead provide commendations for such activities as serving on safety committees, suggesting ways to strengthen safety and health, completing company-wide training programs or participating in investigations to indentify hazards. But while these may be important tasks, they are tied to an activity rather than an outcome. Essentially, OSHA is saying that injury-and-illness-rate-based incentive programs are potential violations while behavior-based programs are not.

OSHA's memo is intended to be used by inspectors and investigators as they visit workplaces.  While there have been few cases of companies being fined for reasonable incentive programs, the memo still is significant.

We also should understand that it was the Government Accountability Office that prompted the OSHA memo. In an April report on workplace safety incentive programs, the GAO surveyed two studies examining whether incentive programs potentially could lead to a disincentive to report injuries. Both of those studies found no correlation, yet the GAO report still led to the OSHA memo.

OSHA  Takes  Aggressive Stance

This latest memo is yet another sign that OSHA continues to find fault with many traditional safety approaches. OSHA, however, doesn't seem to have an issue with pay-for-piece work. What greater incentive is there for unsafe behavior than the possibility of increased earnings?

It leaves open to interpretation the "how" and "why" of a safety incentive program. Is a party to mark a safety milestone an opportunity to reward and thank employees, something that most human resources experts tell us workers  crave? Or is it a form of pressure to prevent employees from reporting injuries? In many cases, the answer is subjective -- and that subjectivity conceivably could lead to fines. OSHA's aggressive stance may be well founded in some cases, but it is so broad and confusing that many companies could be found at fault.

Discuss this Article 1

Kevin Moore
on Oct 22, 2012

The incentive to sustain a safe and healthy work environment with a moral, legal, and defensible OSH Record-keeping really begins with the individual employee; but then, that single employee has an unseen interaction with the record-keeper!. Thus, workers inevitably rely upon superiors and peers to maintain the company's good work ethic. That reliance creates the the incentive to cross fine line to support a businesses' ill-gotten reasons. If the company's OSH Injury and Illness record-keeping leadership and safety culture is cohesive and fair, that program hopefully begins from the top and moves downward so that the ink in the ointment never becomes an issue and OSH statistics is honest and with good intentions. But the company begins molding their relationship with new employees or reforming a company's takeover with a single employee! As the company grows, the personnel interaction also begins either the slippery slope or the sustained continuum.That is the enigma wrapped in a riddle of an OSH-darn situation that takes ingenuity to answer!

Please or Register to post comments.

Should OSHA spend time editing out references to obsolete equipment (that companies don't have to worry about) or should OSHA get out a rule like Silica that causes a lot of lung disease? I trust the business community to know when to skip obsolete sections of a rule. Jim should, too.

on Jan. 9, 2013

Newsletter Signup