Improving Compliance Through Accurate MSDSs and Hazmat Inventory
The challenge today for organizations is to effectively manage their entire chemical inventory so they can stay in compliance and avoid the dangers, fines and fees associated with not doing so.
Article Tools
Advertisement
Top Articles
Most Popular
E-Mailed
Discussed
Recent
In the hazmat world today, most large organizations follow a
time-honored process for identifying critical compliance needs and
spend the money necessary to make it work. It is a process that
tilts the compliance board in advantage of the bigger
players.
It starts with a sophisticated purchasing or procurement system,
usually with a module that enables environmental health and safety
(EHS) staff to review and approve all incoming hazardous items.
Nothing arrives into a big company unnoticed. Next, the chemical or
product is tracked through some type of bar code or RFID-tagged
inventory management system, and data on its location and specific
usage is recorded.
Material safety data sheets (MSDSs) are obtained and tracked,
using a sophisticated document and data management system that is
tied into procurement and chemical tracking. At the end of all
this, compliance reports required by EPA and local agencies are
generated and submitted, usually electronically. At this point,
management plans are made or modified, staff are trained or
retrained and the company moves forward safely until the next
monthly review period.
This utopian view of compliance management has been practiced
for so long in so many high-profile companies that it has become
the de facto process for managing compliance. In the world most EHS
managers live in, however, the tools and resources just described
do not exist. Companies today are forced to manage hazardous
materials with limited budgets, staff, tools and systems.
Today, organizations need to create a new framework that takes
into account the whole picture of hazmat compliance and its effect
on the organization. Companies need to set their sights and marshal
resources in one key area – an accurate hazmat
inventory.
The picture begins with an accurate, up-to-date inventory of the
pure chemicals, mixtures and products within the organization. The
inventory becomes the foundation upon which the company manages
other critical data and turns that data into knowledge on the
hazards present in each of its facilities. This knowledge, when
applied on a geographical, functional and hierarchal level within
an organization, helps EHS staff make better business
decisions.
This increases the value of the organization by reducing risk,
cost and liability. A good hazmat inventory improves the bottom
line and the basics are easy to understand and implement.
The Inventory
How Often? The frequency with which an
inventory should be reviewed will depend on the size of the
business and number of locations/departments that contain hazardous
materials, the sophistication of purchasing and approval processes
and the expected turnover of chemicals and other hazardous
materials.
In an ideal world, a master inventory should be taken at least
annually by the person responsible for the inventory in a specific
location/department. Each new purchase or disposal should be
tracked and the inventory modified throughout the year. EHS
supervisors at each facility should have pre-purchase review and
approval rights for any new product or chemical. Inventories from
separate locations within an organization should be rolled up into
a corporate-level inventory for analysis and to ensure consistency
in process and purchasing.
What Data to Record? At a minimum, the location
of each product or chemical should be recorded as well as the
container size and quantity on hand of the material, the name of
the product or chemical, the name of the company that made the
product or chemical and any part number or description assigned by
the manufacturer. This basic data will enable EHS staff to match
the item to an MSDS, which can provide all the critical data needed
for reporting and exposures.
Problems: The staff conducting the inventory
may come across unlabeled, illegible and secondary labeled
containers. Record these items in a separate discrepancy document,
with their specific location and description, then physically flag
the item itself, with stickers, labels or string that is easily
visible. Review the discrepancy document at the completion of the
inventory process to determine appropriate actions such as
re-identifying products with appropriate labels and/or removing
products from the facility.
Completing the Picture
Once an accurate inventory is obtained, it is possible to begin
to add value to each record by associating other data, documents or
records with each inventory item and supporting this information
with on-site EHS staff or outside resources to assist employees in
use and interpretation. This is an important step in seeing the
“whole picture.”
MSDSs: Associate each item in the inventory
with a manufacturer-specific MSDS and keep the inventory list and
MSDS available for easy access by employees. The MSDS provides
vital information for exposures and the specific characteristics of
the chemicals in a product or mixture. Many companies keep the
inventory list and corresponding MSDS in a file – hard copy
or electronic – forever to meet OSHA’s exposure record
keeping requirements. A process for obtaining new or updated MSDSs
will be required as products change, or MSDSs go out of
date.
Classification: Assign each item in the
inventory a National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) and
Hazardous Materials Identification System (HMIS) rating and
classify the item for common modes of transport. NFPA has a system
for identifying the hazards of a chemical that was developed with
the needs of fire protection agencies in mind. The local fire
department may require this information be provided along with the
chemical inventory.
The HMIS rating is a labeling system developed by the National
Paint and Coatings Association to quickly identify the hazards
associated with a certain material. Inventory items should also
receive a classification based on how the item is shipped, whether
by ground, air or vessel. Each mode requires a different
classification based on the size and quantity of the chemicals
being transported.
Further instructions also will be needed on how to properly
package different types of hazardous materials, what marking and
labels go on the package, which placards go on the vehicle, how to
complete the required shipping documentation and who to call in a
transport emergency.
Why is the inventory so important? Because with so many
companies doing it so poorly, a company that does it right gains a
significant strategic advantage. When analyzed, the size and
diversity of hazardous products within an organization is almost
always a surprise. EHS staff and managers have not seen the
“whole picture” and the result is misguided programs,
misleading reporting, insufficient training and poor
decision-making.
The accuracy of the inventory has cascading affects within an
organization, from specific EHS responsibilities to employee
well-being, management decision-making and corporate
responsibility. If even 10 percent of your inventory is inaccurate,
the following issues may arise:
MSDS Compliance – MSDSs will not always
be available when needed, or when reviewed may contain outdated
information. Staff may be spending valuable time and resources
acquiring and maintaining MSDS for products that are not used or
stored on site. At the same time, if a company uses its MSDS files
as its 30-year exposure record, it could include chemicals and
products that were not actually used, thus increasing the
company’s potential liability.
Chemical Exposures – On-site data may not
be available for the chemicals to which an employee is exposed. If
the data is provided, it may refer to a previous or generic version
of the product, increasing the likelihood of
mistreatment.
Disposal of Hazardous Waste – The
designated budget for disposal costs may be inadequate if there are
items being used and disposed/recycled that the company is unaware
of. Contingency planning for emergency response will be
incomplete.
Regulatory Reporting – Sensitive
chemicals (such as those that appear on SARA 302 Extremely
Hazardous Substances List) may be excluded from required reporting.
Items listed on the inventory but not actually used or stored on
site could trigger higher reporting thresholds and unnecessarily
lead to higher fees related to the amount reported.
Training and Preparedness – An incomplete
inventory can hamper employee awareness of the chemicals in their
workplace. This significantly increases the risk of exposure or
injury and the related cost of treatment. Lack of related inventory
data, such as MSDS and storage quantities, also can mean that all
hazards are not properly evaluated.
Similarly, if a company assumes that the inventories at all
sites or departments within its organization are the same, the
following issues may arise:
MSDS Compliance – Site-specific MSDSs are
not immediately available, in another building or office, or are
completely unavailable. In a true emergency, such as ingestion,
inhalation or exposure, treatment information contained on the MSDS
will not be accessible by responding personnel. The company is then
out of compliance with the Hazard Communication standard, which
requires access to MSDSs for employees, with no barriers. This
exposes the organization to the most commonly cited OSHA
violations.
Chemical Exposures – If a company is
unaware of the specific hazards at a given site or within a
department, it may not be prepared to respond to employee exposure
or injury. In addition, it may not have proper personal protective
equipment, eyewash stations or containment tools in place for the
specific chemicals used or stored at a site.
Disposal of Hazardous Waste – Established
processes for handling specific waste streams may not be adequate.
This could lead to waste on site, and the related risk and cost,
longer than necessary. Uncertainty about what exactly is in a
company’s waste stream may result in using waste contractors
that do not have proper training, certification, tools and
insurance to properly handle its needs. This applies to its staff
as well, who may not have the training and tools to manage the
waste they are generating.
Regulatory Reporting – Using a
“master” report based on one location as representative
of all locations may cause some chemicals to be reported
unnecessarily. This could also trigger additional local or state
reporting and their associated cost. The reverse also is true: A
“master” report could leave some chemicals unreported,
increasing risk and opening the company up to potential fines for
not reporting the true on-site chemicals.
Training and Preparedness – Without an
understanding of the exact nature of the hazards at a specific
location, proper training will not be possible. Locations where the
amounts of hazards have been underestimated will not have enough
training. This is amplified in situations where substances that
require unique handling procedures, such as lead and mercury, are
found on site. Overtraining also can occur, which unnecessarily
increases training cost.
Simply starting with an accurate inventory can result in more
wins under your belt. By focusing efforts on gathering and
analyzing the right information, EHS personnel can impact the cost
for their organization to acquire, track, store, ship and dispose
of hazardous materials and improve the understanding of hazardous
materials among the employees throughout the
organization.
EHS departments are winning every day because they are looking
at the right data and making good decisions. Strive to become one
of them.
Jess Kraus is the founder of the 3E Co. of Carlsbad, Calif. For more information, visit http://www.3ecompany.com.
Want to use this article? Click here for options!
© 2009 Penton Media Inc.