CSB
An explosion of what was thought to be nonhazardous materials blew the top off of this tank, killing one worker and severely injuring another.
An explosion of what was thought to be nonhazardous materials blew the top off of this tank, killing one worker and severely injuring another.
An explosion of what was thought to be nonhazardous materials blew the top off of this tank, killing one worker and severely injuring another.
An explosion of what was thought to be nonhazardous materials blew the top off of this tank, killing one worker and severely injuring another.
An explosion of what was thought to be nonhazardous materials blew the top off of this tank, killing one worker and severely injuring another.

CSB: Even Seemingly ‘Non-Hazardous’ Materials Can Explode

Aug. 28, 2014
Although it will be a while before OSHA issues a report on its investigation of an explosion at the Omega Protein facility in Mississippi, the U.S. Chemical Safety Board’s chair has some advice for employers.

Earlier in August, a team of U.S. Chemical Safety Board (CSB) investigators deployed to the Omega Protein facility in Moss Point, Miss., where a tank explosion on July 28 killed a contract worker and severely injured another.

The CSB team, working alongside federal OSHA inspectors, found that the incident occurred during hot work on or near a tank containing eight inches of a slurry of water and fish matter known as “stickwater.”

The explosion blew the lid off the 30-foot-high tank, fatally injuring a contract worker who was on top of the tank. A second contract worker on the tank was severely injured. CSB investigators commissioned laboratory testing of the stickwater and found telltale signs of microbial activity in the samples, such as the presence of volatile fatty acids in the liquid samples and off-gassing of flammable methane and hydrogen sulfide.

The stickwater inside of the storage tank had been thought to be nonhazardous. No combustible gas testing was done on the contents of the tank before the hot work commenced, according to CSB.

“This tragedy underscores the extreme importance of careful hot work planning, hazard evaluation and procedures for all storage tanks, whether or not flammable material is expected to be present,” said CSB Chair Rafael Moure-Eraso, Ph.D. “Hot work dangers are not limited to the oil, gas, and chemical sectors where flammability hazards are commonplace.”

Moure-Eraso said CSB now has examined three serious hot work incidents – all with fatalities – involving hot work on tanks of biological or organic matter. In addition to the most recent one, he mentioned these two:

  • At the Packaging Corporation of America (PCA), three workers were killed on July 29, 2008, as they were performing hot work on a catwalk above an 80-foot-tall tank of “white water,” a slurry of pulp fiber waste and water. CSB laboratory testing identified anaerobic, hydrogen-producing bacteria in the tank.  The hydrogen gas ignited, ripping open the tank lid and sending workers tumbling to their deaths.
  • On Feb. 16, 2009, a welding contractor was killed while repairing a water clarifier tank at the ConAgra Foods facility in Boardman, Ore. The tank held water and waste from potato washing; the CSB investigation found that water and organic material had built up beneath the base of the tank and decayed through microbial action, producing flammable gas that exploded.

“Mixtures of water with fish, potatoes or cardboard waste understandably could be assumed to be benign and pose little safety risk to workers,” said Moure-Eraso. However, he added, “It is vital that companies, contract firms and maintenance personnel recognize that in the confines of a storage tank, seemingly non-hazardous organic substances can release flammable gases at levels that cause the vapor space to exceed the lower flammability limit. Under those conditions, a simple spark or even conducted heat from hot work can prove disastrous.”

Moure-Eraso said he is urging all companies to follow the positive example set by the DuPont Corp. after a fatal hot work tragedy occurred at a DuPont chemical site near Buffalo, N.Y.. Following CSB recommendations from 2012, DuPont instituted a series of reforms to hot work safety practices on a global basis, including requirements for combustible gas monitoring when planning for welding or other hot work on or near storage tanks or adjacent spaces.

“Combustible gas testing is simple, safe, and affordable. It is a recommended practice of the National Fire Protection Association, the American Petroleum Institute, FM Global and other safety organizations that produce hot work guidance,” noted Moure-Eraso. “Combustible gas testing is important on tanks that hold or have held flammables, but it is equally important – if not more so – for tanks where flammables are not understood to be present. It will save lives.”

Sponsored Recommendations

Making the Case for Occupational Health Software

March 13, 2024
Deciding to invest in Occupational Health (OH) software can be a challenging leap for many organizations. This article will equip businesses with insightful strategies for effectively...

Preventing SIFs with Digitization: Reduce Serious Injuries and Fatalities with Technology

March 13, 2024
This eBook discusses the origins of SIF prevention, outlines principles, models and tools available to EHS leaders to better detect and address SIF potential in their business...

Best Immunization Practices: Workplace Vaccine Clinics

March 13, 2024
Immunization practices continue to play a part in maintaining worker health and well-being. To minimize the risk of at-work infections and the business disruptions sure to follow...

Basic Requirements of Lockout Tagout

Feb. 27, 2024
This 1 hour webinar defines the importance of lockout tagout, its scope, the basic elements of an energy control program and alternative measures.

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!