Are Manufacturer's Recommendations the Best Solution?

What does the term "manufacturers' recommendations" really mean in the real world?

Article Tools

  • Bookmark

I’ve spent more than 35 years in safety, first as a compliance officer with Maryland OSHA, then as independent consultant. My work has given me the opportunity to review hundreds of written safety and health programs, on a wide range of topics in a plethora of industries ranging from small “mom and pop” operations to multinational conglomerates.

One thing I’ve noticed about many written programs is that they contained as statement like, "All equipment shall be maintained in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations." Now that sounds perfectly reasonable, doesn't it? Who knows better than the manufacturer what maintenance is required?

After reviewing a fall protection or confined space program, I would ask, “What maintenance do you perform on your retracting lifelines or your toxic gas monitors?” I often was met with a blank – or at best – quizzical look.

When I saw that look, I would respond, “Well, it says right here that you “will maintain equipment according to the manufacturer’s recommendations,” so I'm asking you: what does the manufacturer recommend?” In most cases, I got a mindless shrug. Rarely could anyone track down the original manual or instructions.

What good does it do to have a high-minded requirement in a written program if there is no practical way of achieving the stated objective?

Perhaps it would be a better idea to replace the generic statement about manufacturers’ recommendations with a two-column table. The first column would list the frequency that particular maintenance operations are performed on equipment – for example, daily, weekly, monthly or annually. In the second column, the specific work to be performed should be listed.

This simple digest would stand a much better chance of being followed than some clichéd statement. Moreover, the table could be printed, laminated, fitted with a grommet and wired to the equipment so it is readily accessible for all users to follow.

Next time, I’ll discuss if it is a good idea to follow manufacturers’ recommendations with respect to calibrating toxic gas monitors.

John Rekus may be reached at john-rekus@comcast.net.

Want to use this article? Click here for options!
© 2010 Penton Media Inc.

Acceptable Use Policy comments powered by Disqus

SafetyLive TV

SafetyLive TV

Check out SafetyLive TV now!

Tune in daily to see company video programs, product demonstrations, reports from industry trade shows and interviews with newsmakers.

Featured Videos:

MCR Safety Logo

MCR Safety - Making Safety a LifeStyle

MCR Safety’s Professional Grade PPE delivers a higher standard for consumers that demand the very best in safety.

More Videos

Online Resources

Webinars

Legislated ergonomics standard or not, recession or boom time, companies are realizing the benefits of integrating a sustainable ergonomics process within their business operations. The approach to managing and reducing ergonomic injuries and their costs vary widely. Register Now


More Webinars

Podcasts

Learn about ISO 16602, the international standard that classifies chemical protective clothing performance.

Listen now.

More Podcasts

eNews

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit ruled that in the case of Elaine Chao v. Summit Contractors, OSHA regulation 29 C.F.R. Sec. 1910.12(a) “is unambiguous in that it does not preclude OSHA from issuing citations to employers for violations when their own employees are not exposed to any hazards related to the violations.”

Read Entire Issue

Pop Quiz


Entries with a 100% score are automatically entered into a drawing for a $50 Visa Gift Card!

Take the pop quiz!

What You're Saying

Featured Suppliers