GAO: Federal Workers Comp Programs Exceed Estimated Costs

A new GAO report analyzing the structure and cost of four federal compensation programs for workers injured by harmful substances revealed that these programs were expanded beyond their original scope to cover additional medical conditions, increase benefits and expand eligibility categories. For example, the Black Lung Program – a temporary program for disabled coal miners – paid $41 billion in benefits, more than 13 times initial estimates of $3 billion.

Article Tools

  • Bookmark

The study, which also analyzed the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP), the Radiation Exposure Compensation Program (RECP) and the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program (EEOICP), was conducted in light of recent legislative proposals to expand the benefits provided by the September 11th Victim Compensation Fund of 2001. GAO’s analysis aimed to determine if expanding the fund would be beneficial.

GAO found that as the federal role for these four programs increased and eligibility expanded, so have the costs, as demonstrated by the Black Lung program. RECP also exceeded its initial estimate by about $247 million. In addition, the annual administrative costs for the programs for fiscal year 2004 ranged from approximately $3 million for RECP to about $89.5 million for EEOICP.

The Black Lung Program and RECP exceeded their initial costs because they were expanded to include additional categories of claimants.

The GAO report also determined that the number of claims filed for three of the programs significantly exceeded initial estimates. In addition, program structure, including the approval process and the extent to which claimants and payers were allowed to appeal claim decisions in the courts, affected the length of time it took to finalize claims and compensate eligible claimants.

For example, it can take years to approve some EEOICP claims because one of the agencies involved in the approval process is required to undergo a lengthy process to determine the levels of radiation to which claimants were exposed.

For the full report, go to http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d08628t.pdf.

Want to use this article? Click here for options!
© 2010 Penton Media Inc.

Acceptable Use Policy comments powered by Disqus

SafetyLive TV

SafetyLive TV

Check out SafetyLive TV now!

Tune in daily to see company video programs, product demonstrations, reports from industry trade shows and interviews with newsmakers.

Featured Videos:

MCR Safety Logo

MCR Safety - Making Safety a LifeStyle

MCR Safety’s Professional Grade PPE delivers a higher standard for consumers that demand the very best in safety.

More Videos

Online Resources

Webinars

Legislated ergonomics standard or not, recession or boom time, companies are realizing the benefits of integrating a sustainable ergonomics process within their business operations. The approach to managing and reducing ergonomic injuries and their costs vary widely. Register Now


More Webinars

Podcasts

Learn about ISO 16602, the international standard that classifies chemical protective clothing performance.

Listen now.

More Podcasts

eNews

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit ruled that in the case of Elaine Chao v. Summit Contractors, OSHA regulation 29 C.F.R. Sec. 1910.12(a) “is unambiguous in that it does not preclude OSHA from issuing citations to employers for violations when their own employees are not exposed to any hazards related to the violations.”

Read Entire Issue

Pop Quiz


Entries with a 100% score are automatically entered into a drawing for a $50 Visa Gift Card!

Take the pop quiz!

What You're Saying

Featured Suppliers