EPA Quits River Cleanup Talks With Dow

EPA recently halted negotiations with Dow Chemical, claiming the company has not offered a deal representing comprehensive cleanup efforts of the dioxin-contaminated Tittabawassee River system.

Article Tools

  • Bookmark

The targeted area, beginning upstream of Dow’s Midland, Mich., facility and extending downstream to the Saginaw River, contains dioxins and furans, byproducts from the manufacture of chlorine-based products. EPA claims Dow’s past waste disposal practices, fugitive emissions and incineration resulted in on- and off-site dioxin and furan contamination.

EPA and Dow began negotiating in October under provisions of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, or Superfund, to reach a settlement on conducting a study and interim cleanup actions for the river system.

"EPA does not believe that the deal Dow is offering goes far enough,” said Ralph Dollhopf, associate director for the Superfund division of EPA's Regional Office in Chicago. “EPA simply will not accept any deal that is not comprehensive.”

"I am extremely disappointed with this outcome," said Regional Administrator Mary A. Gade. "EPA approached negotiations with high hopes and realistic expectations. Our team put in many long hours of good faith efforts that came to an unfortunate end today. EPA is now reviewing its options for ensuring that dioxin contamination in the river system and the Midland area can be fully addressed."

David Keplar, Dow’s senior vice president, said they didn’t understand why the agency decided to end the negotiations so “abruptly.”

“We were prepared to commit immense human and financial resources on early, comprehensive actions, all in full compliance with EPA guidance and regulations,” Keplar said. “This was a real opportunity to actually accelerate resolving the situation; now we’re faced with additional barriers and delays.”

The company emphasized that it remained committed to “clearly communicating and working with [the] community, EPA, the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) and other key stakeholders in this process.”

Dow spokesperson John Musser told OccupationalHazards.com that Dow submitted a “good faith” proposal Dec. 10, following negotiation discussions with EPA and MDEQ officials. EPA then extended negotiations for an additional 30 days.

On the day they were notified of EPA’s decision to end discussions, Dow was ready to submit a modified proposal, Musser said.

Want to use this article? Click here for options!
© 2010 Penton Media Inc.

Acceptable Use Policy comments powered by Disqus

SafetyLive TV

SafetyLive TV

Check out SafetyLive TV now!

Tune in daily to see company video programs, product demonstrations, reports from industry trade shows and interviews with newsmakers.

Featured Videos:

MCR Safety Logo

MCR Safety - Making Safety a LifeStyle

MCR Safety’s Professional Grade PPE delivers a higher standard for consumers that demand the very best in safety.

More Videos

Online Resources

Webinars

Legislated ergonomics standard or not, recession or boom time, companies are realizing the benefits of integrating a sustainable ergonomics process within their business operations. The approach to managing and reducing ergonomic injuries and their costs vary widely. Register Now


More Webinars

Podcasts

Learn about ISO 16602, the international standard that classifies chemical protective clothing performance.

Listen now.

More Podcasts

eNews

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit ruled that in the case of Elaine Chao v. Summit Contractors, OSHA regulation 29 C.F.R. Sec. 1910.12(a) “is unambiguous in that it does not preclude OSHA from issuing citations to employers for violations when their own employees are not exposed to any hazards related to the violations.”

Read Entire Issue

Pop Quiz


Entries with a 100% score are automatically entered into a drawing for a $50 Visa Gift Card!

Take the pop quiz!

What You're Saying

Featured Suppliers