Construction Industry Appeals Voluntary Ergonomics Standard

On Nov. 9, trade groups representing commercial and residential builders appealed the American National Standards Institute’s (ANSI) voluntary ergonomics standard for the construction industry.

Article Tools

  • Bookmark

The American Society of Safety Engineers (ASSE) oversaw the process that led to ANSI’s adoption of  the standard, ANSI/ASSE A10.40-200X, for final review on June 4. The voluntary standard offers resources to prevent musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) and encourages training and use of protective equipment and engineering controls. Its suggestions include offering breaks and job rotation for repetitive tasks and allowing employees to work with items at waist height to avoid bending over.

The construction industry appeal, however, stated that there is no scientific evidence to support the need for the standard or evidence that the standard could prevent MSD injuries, and calls for the standard’s “immediate withdrawal.”

Voting Process was Flawed, Construction Industry Says

According to the appeal, the committee that voted 76 percent in favor of the standard did not represent a consensus because it was stacked with pro-ergonomic members. The appeal also claimed the process was flawed by “fatal procedural deficiencies.”

“It strains credulity to assert that a voluntary consensus standard exists in the face of opposition by the construction industry employers,” the appeal said, and added that some of the issues “are so contentious they do not lend themselves to the development of consensus standards.”

About half of all ANSI voluntary standards are later used to support or create federal rules. The industry may be concerned that OSHA might model a future rule based on the ANSI standard, or may begin citing employers for ergonomics infractions because of the standard.

Furthermore, if a Democrat is elected president in 2008, it could mean the return of a federal ergonomics standard; most Democratic candidates currently support preventing workers from ergonomic-related injuries. Construction companies were exempt from the ergonomics rule imposed by the Clinton administration.

An appeal decision is expected in February 2008.

Want to use this article? Click here for options!
© 2010 Penton Media Inc.

Acceptable Use Policy comments powered by Disqus

SafetyLive TV

SafetyLive TV

Check out SafetyLive TV now!

Tune in daily to see company video programs, product demonstrations, reports from industry trade shows and interviews with newsmakers.

Featured Videos:

MCR Safety Logo

MCR Safety - Making Safety a LifeStyle

MCR Safety’s Professional Grade PPE delivers a higher standard for consumers that demand the very best in safety.

More Videos

Online Resources

Webinars

Legislated ergonomics standard or not, recession or boom time, companies are realizing the benefits of integrating a sustainable ergonomics process within their business operations. The approach to managing and reducing ergonomic injuries and their costs vary widely. Register Now


More Webinars

Podcasts

Learn about ISO 16602, the international standard that classifies chemical protective clothing performance.

Listen now.

More Podcasts

eNews

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit ruled that in the case of Elaine Chao v. Summit Contractors, OSHA regulation 29 C.F.R. Sec. 1910.12(a) “is unambiguous in that it does not preclude OSHA from issuing citations to employers for violations when their own employees are not exposed to any hazards related to the violations.”

Read Entire Issue

Pop Quiz


Entries with a 100% score are automatically entered into a drawing for a $50 Visa Gift Card!

Take the pop quiz!

What You're Saying

Featured Suppliers