OSHA Settles Challenge to Hex Chrome Standard

As part of a settlement agreement, OSHA published an amendment in the Oct. 31 Federal Register to the compliance date provision of its hexavalent chromium standard. The amendment creates an optional, alternative compliance timetable for metal- and surface-finishing operations at appropriate facilities.

Article Tools

  • Bookmark

As part of a settlement agreement, OSHA published an amendment in the Oct. 31 Federal Register to the compliance date provision of its hexavalent chromium standard. The amendment creates an optional, alternative compliance timetable for metal- and surface-finishing operations at appropriate facilities.

The amendment is part of a settlement agreement with the Surface Finishing Industry Council (SFIC), Public Citizen Health Research Group and the United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, and it resolves a legal challenge by the SFIC to OSHA's hexavalent chromium standard.

Facilities that become parties to the agreement must implement engineering controls for electroplating operations by Dec. 31, 2008, but will have relief from certain respirator requirements in the mean time, according to OSHA.

The amendment has no impact on the compliance requirement for facilities that are not eligible to or do not become parties to the agreement.

A facility is eligible to become a party to the agreement if the employer is a member of SFIC or if the facility is a surface-finishing or metal-finishing job shop that sells plating or anodizing services to other companies. The facility also should be within the jurisdiction of federal OSHA, the agency said.

Employers can make their eligible facilities parties to the agreement by sending OSHA a completed declaration of party status. Declarations, OSHA's settlement with SFIC and the Federal Register notice are available on OSHA's Web site. A separate declaration must be completed for each facility and must be received by OSHA or postmarked on or before Nov. 30.

Petitions for review of the hexavalent chromium standard filed by other petitioners remain pending in the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.


- Katherine Torres

Want to use this article? Click here for options!
© 2009 Penton Media Inc.

Acceptable Use Policy comments powered by Disqus

SafetyLive TV

SafetyLive TV

Check out SafetyLive TV now!

Tune in daily to see company video programs, product demonstrations, reports from industry trade shows and interviews with newsmakers.

Featured Videos:

Be a Builder with 80/20 Inc:
The Industrial Erector Set

Create custom anything with 80/20’s t-slotted aluminum framing system, custom cut panels, and fabricated aluminum parts. Custom safety solutions, ergonomical workstations, material handling racks- your imagination is the limit.

More Videos

Online Resources

Webinars

Featured Webinar:

Arc Flash Safety

Do you want your employees to be safe from injuries caused by electrical incidents? This Webinar offers guidance on how OSHA and NFPA 70E, the National Electrical Code, can help you achieve that goal. Register Today!

More Webinars

Podcasts

Featured Podcast:

Global EHS Management

Two experts discuss the challenges and best practices of global EHS management.

Listen now.

More Podcasts

eNews

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit ruled that in the case of Elaine Chao v. Summit Contractors, OSHA regulation 29 C.F.R. Sec. 1910.12(a) “is unambiguous in that it does not preclude OSHA from issuing citations to employers for violations when their own employees are not exposed to any hazards related to the violations.”

Read Entire Issue

Pop Quiz

Entries with a 100% score are automatically entered into a drawing for a $50 MasterCard Gift Card!
Take the pop quiz!

What You're Saying

Storefronts